Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #266885
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) |
| Date | 2015-09-10 03:07 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <msqs61$gh9$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <a_OdnSaFsra7yXPInZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msn3d2$pn$1@pcls7.std.com> <r-idnd2Wjvy2hHLInZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mspqfc$sjq$1@pcls7.std.com> <weadnantNrh4LW3InZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Go ahead look it up yourself. What percentage of a building is left behind >after a collapse or a controlled demolition? Let's see. The towers were 95% air when they stood. 1368 feet*.05=68.4 feet. Of course, the mass of the towers won't pack down with no voids in the rubble, and that will increase the height. On the other hand, much of the debris fell outside the footprint of the base of the towers, covering more area, and that will decrease the height of the debris pile. As an approximation, we can say these two effects pretty much cancel and we're left with the original figure of close to 70 feet deep. That's the depth of the bathtub so we'd expect the pile to reach close to street level or the original plaza level. And guess what? That's the level of the debris we see in that picture of all the debris that you keep harping about!
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:38 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:28 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
Re: Rocky lies some more jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:57 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 00:48 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 02:42 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 16:46 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
Re: Rocky still deluded jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:08 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 17:32 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:07 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:57 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:11 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 18:11 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:06 +0000
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500
Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:43 -0500
csiph-web