Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275260

Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mslhv1$l2i$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mslb8j$jsi$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>astronomy restored
>>>
>>> You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an
>>> unrelated group.
>
>>Funny, I didn't see "newsgroup cop" in your description.
>
> You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an
> unrelated group.

Funny, I didn't see "newsgroup doctor" in your description either.

>>>>What I've stated over and over and over again is that there was so much
>>>>radiation the first 3 days that nobody was allowed into GZ in the first 
>>>>2
>>>>days and then only Iron Workers were allowed on the third day and then
>>>>after
>>>>that the First Responders still had to wear dosimeter badges and limit
>>>>their
>>>>time at GZ.
>>>
>>> Liar.  They were searching the rubble for survivors almost immediately 
>>> and
>>> rescued people the next day.
>
>>That is the story that we heard on TV but I never heard about any rescues.
>
> Then you weren't paying attention.  11 people were rescued from the debris
> on the first day.

link?

> Instead, you chose to believe the lies that the kookmeisters fed you, that
> it was to radioactive for anyone to go in there.

too radioactive would be more like it.

>>Plus what I heard
> from other kooktards, right?

ROTFLMAO when you are obviosly one of the kooks that drank the kook aid from 
the media.  The crap about the Pentagon and Prankville, PA was so bogus I 
couldn't see how anybody could fall for it unless they missed the original 
broadcast.

>>> You claim that only iron workers were allowed in on the third day? 
>>> WRONG!
>>> The freaking President of the United States was standing on the Pile on
>>> the third day, with NO freaking protection at all, not even a hard hat!
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7OCgMPX2mE
>
>>Duh.  He had to open up the Stock Market so all those people with put
>>options could get their money.
>
> But he did go in there, right?  Without any radiation protection, right?
> This PROVES that you lied, saying that only protected iron workers were
> allowed in on the third day.
>
> Stupid lying kooktard!
>
>>Plus I'll bet he didn't go anywhere near the places where the three nukes
>>were detonated.
>
> The whole of Manhattan would be too "hot" for anyone to enter after three
> days after three nukes were detonated!  But since there obviously weren't
> any nukes at all, Manhattan never was "hot".

Link?

>>> Look at the link I gave you. It shows pieces of WTC7 in the street right
>>> next to the damaged part of Fiterman Hall.  This shows to non-kooktards
>>> that WTC7 didn't quite collapse neatly into its footprint, and those
>>> pieces or others that fell into Fiterman Hall did the damage to it.
>>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png
>
>>So, if you look at pictures of Fiterman Hall you do not see debris on it
>>from WTC7 but the debris was from Fiterman Hall itself and that is easily
>>explained by the fact it was nuked.  More at:
>
> There's obvious debris in the street immediately adjacent to the Fiterman
> Hall damage!  Admit it.  A chunk of WTC7 fell on Fiterman Hall, collapsing
> part of it.
>
>>  (indexed to start at 2:27:07)
>> http://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=2h27m7s
>
> Oh, good grief, is that Dimitri Khalezov guy ever kooktarded!  He's even
> worse than you!  I watched a few minutes of that kooktardery, enough to
> hear this gem: "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the
> air?"  "Nothing!"   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!  Of course, he redefined the
> nuclear blast wave as a "crushing wave" seconds before.
>
> And again, 4 hours and 16 minutes of kooktardery?  And how many such
> multi-hour videos do you have to brainwash yourselves with??

You want to see tainted videos;  Check out this FOIA video from NIST

NIST FOIA 09-42: R14-UC -- CNN Dub2 01-04 (WTC7 Smoking & Collapse)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqA46_bX5n0

This video is over 15 minutes and if you watch the smoke itself when the 
smoke jumps all the sudden WTC7 comes down.  NIST or someone did not want us 
to the see a flash from WTC7 that a witness to the event saw so they took 
the flash out of the video and that trick can be seen in a lot of the NIST 
FOIA videos especially those on the side that Fiterman Hall was on.

NIST and the media have been fcuking with us for a long long long time and I 
have noticed that you still have not been able to explain why there were 
walls that stood strong from the Twin Towers when the building was rumored 
to have collapsed down.  Obviously the Towers didn't collapse all the way 
down.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Still, until someone can explain why just those parts stood better than 
Dimitri then I have to side with Dimitri as plenty of others do too.

Rocky 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500

csiph-web