Groups > sci.physics > #519669

Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind)

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind)
Date	2015-09-08 00:48 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<mslb8j$jsi$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<NaidneSC87I7U3HInZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> <msisnk$utl$2@pcls7.std.com> <i4GdnasI4KWGnnDInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>astronomy restored

You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an
unrelated group.

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:msisnk$utl$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>The truth is what really destroyed Fiterman Hall was the radiation from 
>>>the
>>>underground nuke used to level WTC7.
>>
>> I thought you said the nukes used to destroy the WTC didn't produce any
>> radiation!

>What I've stated over and over and over again is that there was so much 
>radiation the first 3 days that nobody was allowed into GZ in the first 2 
>days and then only Iron Workers were allowed on the third day and then after 
>that the First Responders still had to wear dosimeter badges and limit their 
>time at GZ.

Liar.  They were searching the rubble for survivors almost immediately and
rescued people the next day.

You claim that only iron workers were allowed in on the third day?  WRONG!
The freaking President of the United States was standing on the Pile on
the third day, with NO freaking protection at all, not even a hard hat!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7OCgMPX2mE

Stoopid lying kooktards.

Poor you.  Your dog ate the Youtube video of the Geiger counter at the
WTC site!

>> p.s.  Does this look like radiation damage to you?
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Fiterman_hall_damage.jpg

>From my earlier post when wikipedia stated "decontamination" that looked 
>like radiation damage to me you idiot.

Well it's not. It's mold and asbestos, fool.

>Now considering the quote from wikipedia that you removed from the OP 
>explain in detail how WTC7 damaged Fiterman Hall when nothing jumped off of 
>WTC7 onto FH?  <G>

Look at the link I gave you. It shows pieces of WTC7 in the street right
next to the damaged part of Fiterman Hall.  This shows to non-kooktards
that WTC7 didn't quite collapse neatly into its footprint, and those
pieces or others that fell into Fiterman Hall did the damage to it.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png

Thread

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:38 +0000
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:28 +0000
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
      Re: Rocky lies some more jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:57 +0000
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 00:48 +0000
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 02:42 +0000
            Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
              Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 16:46 +0000
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
                Re: Rocky still deluded jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:08 +0000
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 17:32 +0000
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:07 +0000
                Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
            Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
              Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:57 -0500
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:11 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 18:11 +0000
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:06 +0000
            Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:43 -0500

csiph-web