Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 00:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1441673299 20370 192.74.137.71 (8 Sep 2015 00:48:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 00:48:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:266687 sci.physics:519669 "Rocky" writes: >astronomy restored You really need to see a shrink about your obsession with posting to an unrelated group. >"Michael Moroney" wrote in message >news:msisnk$utl$2@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" writes: >> >>>The truth is what really destroyed Fiterman Hall was the radiation from >>>the >>>underground nuke used to level WTC7. >> >> I thought you said the nukes used to destroy the WTC didn't produce any >> radiation! >What I've stated over and over and over again is that there was so much >radiation the first 3 days that nobody was allowed into GZ in the first 2 >days and then only Iron Workers were allowed on the third day and then after >that the First Responders still had to wear dosimeter badges and limit their >time at GZ. Liar. They were searching the rubble for survivors almost immediately and rescued people the next day. You claim that only iron workers were allowed in on the third day? WRONG! The freaking President of the United States was standing on the Pile on the third day, with NO freaking protection at all, not even a hard hat! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7OCgMPX2mE Stoopid lying kooktards. Poor you. Your dog ate the Youtube video of the Geiger counter at the WTC site! >> p.s. Does this look like radiation damage to you? >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Fiterman_hall_damage.jpg >From my earlier post when wikipedia stated "decontamination" that looked >like radiation damage to me you idiot. Well it's not. It's mold and asbestos, fool. >Now considering the quote from wikipedia that you removed from the OP >explain in detail how WTC7 damaged Fiterman Hall when nothing jumped off of >WTC7 onto FH? Look at the link I gave you. It shows pieces of WTC7 in the street right next to the damaged part of Fiterman Hall. This shows to non-kooktards that WTC7 didn't quite collapse neatly into its footprint, and those pieces or others that fell into Fiterman Hall did the damage to it. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png