Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275151

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

I've used the video in this post before to see if someone was Cartoon 
Physics blind or not.

A person that is blind to Cartoon Physics will not see any differences 
between the NIST Cartoon of WTC7 and real life.  <G>

Go ahead and take the test if you dare.

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY

First, I'll tell  you what you did not see and that is how WTC7 destroyed 
Fiterman Hall and yet the destruction of Fiterman Hall was blamed on WTC7 as 
proven by wikipedia where wikipedia states this about Fiterman Hall:

"It was heavily damaged during the September 11 attacks in 2001, when debris 
from the collapse of 7 WTC compromised the structure. It became unsafe to 
occupy due to mold growth and asbestos exposure. Because traditional 
demolition would result in an unacceptable environmental impact, the 
building was scheduled for deconstruction and decontamination as part of the 
Lower Manhattan redevelopment project"

Now what did you see besides a total lack of debris that jumped across the 
street to destroy Fiterman Hall?  <G>

The truth is what really destroyed Fiterman Hall was the radiation from the 
underground nuke used to level WTC7.

Rocky 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500

csiph-web