Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550269
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Date | 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <7gu9oc-7rg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <ppt0bblbeamo6hutpb98q440onqgl7tqc8@4ax.com> <91b7oc-0n7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <g0t2bbto5fhefuom1781edved02g6uma8q@4ax.com> <um98oc-0qa.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <vpl3bbhi7d78v3j9kf15hk5n5q2u2e8ur5@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:45:02 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:01:29 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:39:19 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:25:23 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a >>>>>>>>>>>> kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your >>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings, however. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've not seen anyone claim you've been adjudged insane. This >>>>>>>>>>> isn't to say no one has, of course. However, given that lying comes to >>>>>>>>>>> you as naturally as breathing, I'm willing to take the position no one >>>>>>>>>>> has. >>>>>>>>>>> Your posts are consistent with someone who has a mental illness, >>>>>>>>>>> but this doesn't mean you've had a sanity hearing, let alone been >>>>>>>>>>> found to be insane. >>>>>>>>>>> And it's possible your paranoia about "Strategic Writers" is >>>>>>>>>>> nothing more than an act you play out on Usenet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yawn! Babbling nonsense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is unfortunate that you see the truth as babbling nonsense. >>>>>>>>> It's not surprising, but it is unfortunate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>HVAC has already told us that "truth" is anything he says and the only >>>>>>>>thing that is important is what you believe! I'm sure you both "believe" >>>>>>>>the right truth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HVAC isn't a part of this conversation. >>>>>>> The truth is the truth. It's not a matter of belief. And the >>>>>>> truth is, you lied about contrails being analyzed and found to not be >>>>>>> water vapors. >>>>>> >>>>>>Actually, most contrails contain a significant amount of jet fuel >>>>>>combustion products. >>>>> >>>>> I await the evidence of the analysis for this. >>>>> In reality, any jet fuel contained within a contrail will >>>>> constitute a tiny fraction of a percentage. >>>> >>>>Not jet fuel, jet fuel combustion products. >>> >>> Six of one, half dozen of the other. >> >>Nope, jet fuel is a heavy hydrocarbon, jet fuel combustion products are >>water vapor, COx, and NOx, and a few trace things. >> > > Sigh. > My point is that anything other than water vapor will make a very > small percentage of the total. Certainly not enough to call contrails > chemtrails. That water vapor is the major constituent of contrails is blazingly obvious to anyone that actually knows anything about them. Chemtrails is a kook term. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-28 11:17 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:36 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:38 -0800
Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 02:40 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:27 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-31 19:13 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:30 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:22 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:35 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:56 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:28 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 01:31 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:43 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:16 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 02:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:35 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:01 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:05 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:10 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:22 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:29 -0500
Re: There's no cure, just consequences. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 07:08 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
csiph-web