Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #550816

Re: Why Chemtrails?

From benj <nobody@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Why Chemtrails?
References (15 earlier) <405cdf38-522b-4382-9e7d-8595eb8c45b6@googlegroups.com> <2lXsy.214474$Jt4.40096@fx22.iad> <f6e3f168-ad6c-417a-a453-08520c9e7705@googlegroups.com> <kw3ty.403309$983.402754@fx06.iad> <36ff30ff-bc37-46d0-8060-098d8d3ccd3f@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <V4fty.236705$K21.205300@fx02.iad> (permalink)
Organization TeraNews.com
Date 2016-02-05 23:59 -0500

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/05/2016 11:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ said
> Harlow, have you EVER provided ANY statements here of scientific or
> educational value?
> ----------
>
> Yes.

I presume to something of scientific or educational value are your 
comments one poor old Herb's "theories". Neither of you qualify as 
having any value.

> All any of us have ever seen is ego, name-calling,
> ridicule, and lies
> -----------
>
> "Us"?

"Us" being all of the persons on USENET reading your kook posts.
Is it really a problem for you to understand how English works? While 
your knowledge of science is about at the level of an 8th grader 
understanding quantum mechanics, I though you were supposed to be a 
professional strategic writer...er excuse me...you prefer the term 
"wordsmith" as I recall.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
  Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
    Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
      Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
      Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
    Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:28 -0800
      Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0500
      Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 01:31 -0500
        Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:43 -0800
          Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0500
            Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:30 -0800
              Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:59 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:16 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 02:43 -0500
            Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:35 -0800
              Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
  Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600

csiph-web