Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #274341
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Date | 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <91b7oc-0n7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <oaosab1aro87jt9nrogmc7m36ts981218r@4ax.com> <TDEry.205678$qo3.138851@fx16.iad> <vpeuab9rgrs2uvrqdja1tlv6hag8ogotfo@4ax.com> <nbl4oc-c5s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ppt0bblbeamo6hutpb98q440onqgl7tqc8@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:39:19 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:25:23 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>>>> You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a >>>>>>>> kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your >>>>>>>> shortcomings, however. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've not seen anyone claim you've been adjudged insane. This >>>>>>> isn't to say no one has, of course. However, given that lying comes to >>>>>>> you as naturally as breathing, I'm willing to take the position no one >>>>>>> has. >>>>>>> Your posts are consistent with someone who has a mental illness, >>>>>>> but this doesn't mean you've had a sanity hearing, let alone been >>>>>>> found to be insane. >>>>>>> And it's possible your paranoia about "Strategic Writers" is >>>>>>> nothing more than an act you play out on Usenet. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yawn! Babbling nonsense. >>>>> >>>>> It is unfortunate that you see the truth as babbling nonsense. >>>>> It's not surprising, but it is unfortunate. >>>> >>>>HVAC has already told us that "truth" is anything he says and the only >>>>thing that is important is what you believe! I'm sure you both "believe" >>>>the right truth. >>> >>> HVAC isn't a part of this conversation. >>> The truth is the truth. It's not a matter of belief. And the >>> truth is, you lied about contrails being analyzed and found to not be >>> water vapors. >> >>Actually, most contrails contain a significant amount of jet fuel >>combustion products. >> > > I await the evidence of the analysis for this. > In reality, any jet fuel contained within a contrail will > constitute a tiny fraction of a percentage. Not jet fuel, jet fuel combustion products. I stated no percentage of content. Obviously water vapor is the major constituent as water vapor is also a major constituent of jet fuel combustion products. >>> You are, of course, still free to provide valid, verifiable >>> evidence for your claim. But you won't. You have none, so you can't. >> >>Verifiable with binoculars. > > How would the use of binoculars prove contrails are actually > chemtrails? Sure, anyone using them would be able to see the contrails > more easily, but that's all. It becomes obvious where the trails are coming from, i.e. the engines. It is also obvious in air to air photographs. -- Jim Pennino
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 11:48 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:00 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 05:06 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:27 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:02 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:26 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 19:52 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:12 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 21:13 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 16:58 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:53 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:05 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-02 01:53 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:25 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:51 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:31 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:36 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:46 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 19:37 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 17:22 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-04 01:25 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 10:47 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:07 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:34 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:08 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
csiph-web