Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #274357

Re: Why Chemtrails?

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Why Chemtrails?
Date 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <um98oc-0qa.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <vpeuab9rgrs2uvrqdja1tlv6hag8ogotfo@4ax.com> <nbl4oc-c5s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ppt0bblbeamo6hutpb98q440onqgl7tqc8@4ax.com> <91b7oc-0n7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <g0t2bbto5fhefuom1781edved02g6uma8q@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:01:29 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:39:19 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:25:23 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a
>>>>>>>>>> kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your
>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings, however.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>        I've not seen anyone claim you've been adjudged insane. This
>>>>>>>>> isn't to say no one has, of course. However, given that lying comes to
>>>>>>>>> you as naturally as breathing, I'm willing to take the position no one
>>>>>>>>> has.
>>>>>>>>>        Your posts are consistent with someone who has  a mental illness,
>>>>>>>>> but this doesn't mean you've had a sanity hearing, let alone been
>>>>>>>>> found to be insane.
>>>>>>>>>        And it's possible your paranoia about "Strategic Writers" is
>>>>>>>>> nothing more than an act you play out on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yawn! Babbling nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       It is unfortunate that you see the truth as babbling nonsense.
>>>>>>> It's not surprising, but it is unfortunate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>HVAC has already told us that "truth" is anything he says and the only 
>>>>>>thing that is important is what you believe! I'm sure you both "believe" 
>>>>>>the right truth.
>>>>> 
>>>>>      HVAC isn't a part of this conversation.
>>>>>      The truth is the truth. It's not a matter of belief. And the
>>>>> truth is, you lied about contrails being analyzed and found to not be
>>>>> water vapors.
>>>>
>>>>Actually, most contrails contain a significant amount of jet fuel
>>>>combustion products.
>>> 
>>>      I await the evidence of the analysis for this.
>>>      In reality, any jet fuel contained within a contrail will
>>> constitute a tiny fraction of a percentage.
>>
>>Not jet fuel, jet fuel combustion products.
>>
> 
>      Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Nope, jet fuel is a heavy hydrocarbon, jet fuel combustion products are
water vapor, COx, and NOx, and a few trace things.

>      Or do you mean exhaust fumes? If so, my claim remains the same,
> except that it will be exhaust rather than fuel.
>      BTW, I notice you didn't offer evidence of the analysis for your
> claim.
> 
>>I stated no percentage of content.
>>
> 
>      I didn't claim you did.
> 
>>Obviously water vapor is the major constituent as water vapor is also
>>a major constituent of jet fuel combustion products.
>>
> 
>      Water vapor is the bulk of contrails. Anything else will
> constitute a very small percentage of the total. If it equals 5%, I
> would be amazed.

Read the sentence I wrote just above yours until comprehension sets in.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
  Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 11:48 -0800
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:00 -0600
  Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
          Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
            Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
              Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 05:06 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:27 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:02 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:26 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 19:52 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:12 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 21:13 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 16:58 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:53 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:05 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-02 01:53 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:30 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:25 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:51 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:31 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:36 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:46 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 19:37 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 17:22 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-04 01:25 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 10:47 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
              Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:31 -0800
            Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:07 -0800
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:34 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:08 -0500
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600

csiph-web