Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #549749
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Date | 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nbl4oc-c5s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <0gesabpsblfsd5qp7qsifur831qr61stvr@4ax.com> <dmrry.228116$qz7.108452@fx01.iad> <oaosab1aro87jt9nrogmc7m36ts981218r@4ax.com> <TDEry.205678$qo3.138851@fx16.iad> <vpeuab9rgrs2uvrqdja1tlv6hag8ogotfo@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 03:25:23 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > >>>>>> You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a >>>>>> kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your >>>>>> shortcomings, however. >>>>> >>>>> I've not seen anyone claim you've been adjudged insane. This >>>>> isn't to say no one has, of course. However, given that lying comes to >>>>> you as naturally as breathing, I'm willing to take the position no one >>>>> has. >>>>> Your posts are consistent with someone who has a mental illness, >>>>> but this doesn't mean you've had a sanity hearing, let alone been >>>>> found to be insane. >>>>> And it's possible your paranoia about "Strategic Writers" is >>>>> nothing more than an act you play out on Usenet. >>>>> >>>> Yawn! Babbling nonsense. >>> >>> It is unfortunate that you see the truth as babbling nonsense. >>> It's not surprising, but it is unfortunate. >> >>HVAC has already told us that "truth" is anything he says and the only >>thing that is important is what you believe! I'm sure you both "believe" >>the right truth. > > HVAC isn't a part of this conversation. > The truth is the truth. It's not a matter of belief. And the > truth is, you lied about contrails being analyzed and found to not be > water vapors. Actually, most contrails contain a significant amount of jet fuel combustion products. > You are, of course, still free to provide valid, verifiable > evidence for your claim. But you won't. You have none, so you can't. Verifiable with binoculars. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-28 11:17 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:36 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:38 -0800
Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 02:40 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:27 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-31 19:13 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:30 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:22 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:35 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:56 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:28 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 01:31 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:43 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:16 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 02:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:35 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:01 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:05 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:10 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:22 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:29 -0500
Re: There's no cure, just consequences. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 07:08 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
csiph-web