Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #602783
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:26:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58138A81.4543@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:27:29 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. |
| References | <68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 28 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-AR7c2eOX17gVhwgfV+zoVDWjjd3jBn5yf5xiztn7opdxhoSFeRAWyWA2VvXZWdP5j31BZIGVPaNRRwa!35GA15I8kzI08Kpukf5wez9mwF0ixmkQb6xR+4pl4OOBNmQOMkGy/UqFV+j2yHHBineUM2R3g6lN!GWSQRqZEvKo= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2217 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:378315 sci.physics:602783 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > > WikiPedia says: ＜＜ The Many-Worlds interpretation is > > an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts > > the objective reality of the universal wavefunction > > and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse. ＞＞ > > > > "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics" > > as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect. > > > > "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random; > > nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more. > > > > Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand, > > like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random; > > in fact, we _know_ that it isn't. > > > > _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past; > > What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that > change your past? or you have two people running for president...which is the future? Can wiki leaks determind and change the future??
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-27 21:35 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:52 -0400
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 20:53 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 21:34 -0700
csiph-web