Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #602783

Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.

Message-ID <58138A81.4543@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics
Subject Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.
References <68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >
> > WikiPedia says: ＜＜  The Many-Worlds interpretation is
> >   an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts
> >   the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
> >   and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse.  ＞＞
> >
> > "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics"
> > as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect.
> >
> > "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random;
> > nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more.
> >
> > Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> > like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> > in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> >
> > _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> 
> What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that
> change your past?


or you have two people running for president...which is the future? Can
wiki leaks
determind and change the future??

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-27 21:35 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
  Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:52 -0400
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 20:53 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700
    Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 21:34 -0700

csiph-web