Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #602939
| Message-ID | <581573BD.1884@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. |
| References | <68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com> <58151a13$0$28928$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
benj wrote: > > On 10/28/2016 12:35 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> > >> WikiPedia says: << The Many-Worlds interpretation is > >> an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts > >> the objective reality of the universal wavefunction > >> and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse. >> > >> > >> "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics" > >> as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect. > >> > >> "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random; > >> nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more. > >> > >> Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand, > >> like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random; > >> in fact, we _know_ that it isn't. > >> > >> _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past; > > > > > > > > What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that > > change your past? > > > Starfaker you journalist types are all idiots. You been taking fantasy > lessons from HVAC? What you THINK or IMAGINE does not change reality of > what happened in the past. This is simply insane logic. if you remember your past.. and it changes.. you change your past.. Now you must make a new past with your new mother... and play catch up... to the present. You will find your changed past changes your present and future.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-27 21:35 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:27 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:52 -0400
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 20:53 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-29 21:14 -0700
Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 21:34 -0700
csiph-web