Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:26:35 -0500
Message-ID: <58138A81.4543@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:27:29 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics
Subject: Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.
References: <68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-AR7c2eOX17gVhwgfV+zoVDWjjd3jBn5yf5xiztn7opdxhoSFeRAWyWA2VvXZWdP5j31BZIGVPaNRRwa!35GA15I8kzI08Kpukf5wez9mwF0ixmkQb6xR+4pl4OOBNmQOMkGy/UqFV+j2yHHBineUM2R3g6lN!GWSQRqZEvKo=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2217
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:378315 sci.physics:602783

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >
> > WikiPedia says: ＜＜  The Many-Worlds interpretation is
> >   an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts
> >   the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
> >   and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse.  ＞＞
> >
> > "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics"
> > as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect.
> >
> > "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random;
> > nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more.
> >
> > Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> > like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> > in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> >
> > _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> 
> What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that
> change your past?


or you have two people running for president...which is the future? Can
wiki leaks
determind and change the future??