Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #557241
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger |
| Date | Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:51:05 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 71 |
| Message-ID | <1581495.evjVMegUZ6@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <djd8rfF3g9qU1@mid.individual.net> <65439666-c780-450d-93d4-f9af27001826@googlegroups.com> <djdj7dF64j4U1@mid.individual.net> <58bee9fd-eb80-4af7-8c3c-624c521da67b@googlegroups.com> <djdn0gF7601U1@mid.individual.net> <1820234.T3Wigm2pTg@PointedEars.de> <dje12gF9i7tU3@mid.individual.net> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1456591866 24587 eJwNysERwDAIA7CV4oINjNMjsP8Ird6iCepwUc7lLsUzR0WYPNoSFZidsHlev1yg6h5m27/yA/+pD/o= (27 Feb 2016 16:51:06 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:51:06 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLBRIeOR0F/xJ2R3PxDjgdXK7O3YHMIMvi8MwtM25AexyJl2qjdGaj8aQ/bJRe2ae3/AdLPRVC |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:pxJTtGL5bUx/3mLoSbQb4m9EyX0= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLSyEU5PAU/xJ2RzFYXzWacrmbX3hZgqmF7XqSEJ9J6rsYCHWD57D6aPgPK8sRJw== |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:557241 |
Show key headers only | View raw
7 wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> 7 wrote:
>>> There is zero evidence for the present model of
>>> 1. a quantum fluctuation creating a big bang and then invoking
>>> 2. inflation to smooth out the CMB
>>> 3. no theories for slowing and then accelerating universe
>>> 4. no theories for dark matter either
>>> 5. and hot side/cold side of CMB
>>> 6. The axis in the CMB
>>> etc.
>>
>> That is not even wrong.
>>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)#Observational_status>
>
> Just reading the first paragraph its a fail:
>
> "In addition, inflation predicts that the structures visible in the
> Universe today formed through the gravitational collapse of perturbations
> that were formed as quantum mechanical fluctuations in the inflationary
> epoch."
>
> So - no evidence for no.2 other than it exists therefore it must be true.
Incorrect. First of all, that is _not_ “its first paragraph”. You have
conveniently omitted from the first paragraph:
| […] Since Guth's early work, each of these observations has received
| further confirmation, most impressively by the detailed observations
| of the cosmic microwave background made by the Wilkinson Microwave
| Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) spacecraft.[11]
The second paragraph of that section, which you partially quoted, goes on:
| […] Inflation predicts that the observed perturbations should be in
| thermal equilibrium with each other (these are called adiabatic or
| isentropic perturbations). This structure for the perturbations has
| been confirmed by the WMAP spacecraft and other cosmic microwave
| background (CMB) experiments,[11] and galaxy surveys, especially the
| ongoing Sloan Digital Sky Survey.[62] These experiments have shown
| that the one part in 100,000 inhomogeneities observed have exactly
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| the form predicted by theory. Moreover, there is evidence for a slight
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| deviation from scale invariance. The spectral index[ ] nₛ is equal to one
| for a scale-invariant spectrum. The simplest inflation models predict
^^^^^^^
| that this quantity is between 0.92 and 0.98.[63][64][65][66] From WMAP
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| data it can be inferred that nₛ = 0.963 ± 0.012,[67] implying that it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| differs from one at the level of two standard deviations (2σ). This is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| considered an important confirmation of the theory of inflation.[11]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> A condensation model from a gamma ray burst would not demand inflation
> in order to smooth out CMB.
Your gamma-ray burst idea of the beginnings of our universe is not based
on science.
PointedEars
--
Q: Why is electricity so dangerous?
A: It doesn't conduct itself.
(from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 09:33 +0000
Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 03:40 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 12:30 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 04:47 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 05:06 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 08:04 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 05:02 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 13:35 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 06:01 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 16:37 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 09:17 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 09:30 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 15:16 -0500
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 18:56 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 09:00 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 07:08 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 17:15 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 16:26 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 17:51 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 18:13 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 17:13 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 16:22 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 17:53 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 09:07 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 09:26 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 18:47 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 11:56 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 18:01 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 19:06 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 18:16 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 19:39 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 17:09 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-27 16:18 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-27 18:22 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-27 10:55 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-27 19:52 -0500
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 10:09 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-29 10:48 -0500
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 11:59 +1100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 10:05 +0000
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 14:39 +0100
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 09:59 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:01 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 20:01 -0600
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 11:34 -0800
Re: Massive gamma ray burst detected after black hole merger HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 14:10 -0800
csiph-web