Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360325 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 332 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 10:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 13:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 00:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-11 13:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 20:57 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-12 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 15:56 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:39 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:46 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:22 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:35 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:17 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:40 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 07:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:27 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 01:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 10:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 22:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 01:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 12:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 12:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 23:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 21:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 00:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 00:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 00:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 22:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 00:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-18 14:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 00:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 09:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 00:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 13:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 00:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 05:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:16 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:59 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 08:02 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-27 16:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-28 07:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:17 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:34 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 10:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:01 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 16:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:39 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 15:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:18 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-14 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-12 10:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 20:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800
Page 5 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 17 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4fdnta936hho4v7r95btr3c15vicc2obj7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361755 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:42:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <9d7ntad1bod3dnloidgh432ai3jp0v5v1f@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:59:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>>>>existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >>>>> >>>>>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>>>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >>>>> >>>>>You're in a hole. >>>> >>>>Not at all. >>> >>>You just accepted that you were. >> >>Amusing. >> >>I was discussing what you pile so high and deep. That smelly stuff. > >You had to get out of the crap to get a ladder so you could get out of the crap? >Now I understand. As deep as you pile it a ladder is barely usable. > >>>>> Where are you going to get a ladder and a shovel? >>>>> >>>> >>>>The same place you got your god. >>> >> >>No snappy comeback? > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d3mptatngkoe4u5aiheufi5ksubp41qr9b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361760 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:26:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:42:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><9d7ntad1bod3dnloidgh432ai3jp0v5v1f@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:59:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>>>>>existed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >>>>>> >>>>>>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>>>>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >>>>>> >>>>>>You're in a hole. >>>>> >>>>>Not at all. >>>> >>>>You just accepted that you were. >>> >>>Amusing. >>> >>>I was discussing what you pile so high and deep. That smelly stuff. >> >>You had to get out of the crap to get a ladder so you could get out of the crap? >>Now I understand. > >As deep as you pile it a ladder is barely usable. Well, you're the one digging your way out of the crap. Personally you got yourself in it, so you get yourself out of it. But remember, it doesn't do any good to go get a ladder so you can dig yourself out of a hole of crap. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 03:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j9rqtad4ju79i19mnsfejbbnueiru0s8tt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361840 |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:06:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <d3mptatngkoe4u5aiheufi5ksubp41qr9b@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:26:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:42:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><9d7ntad1bod3dnloidgh432ai3jp0v5v1f@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:59:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>>>>>>existed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>>>>>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're in a hole. >>>>>> >>>>>>Not at all. >>>>> >>>>>You just accepted that you were. >>>> >>>>Amusing. >>>> >>>>I was discussing what you pile so high and deep. That smelly stuff. >>> >>>You had to get out of the crap to get a ladder so you could get out of the crap? >>>Now I understand. >> >>As deep as you pile it a ladder is barely usable. > >Well, you're the one digging your way out of the crap. Personally you got >yourself in it, so you get yourself out of it. But remember, it doesn't do any >good to go get a ladder so you can dig yourself out of a hole of crap. > It's your crap. I suspect your parents had a lot to do with your brainwashing when you were growing up. If so that makes you the poster boy for considering religious indoctrination child abuse. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 00:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55DD70DF.4302@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #361878 |
You people don't actually believe that religious leaders actually believe in God, do you???? I mean... look at your yellow pages.. it's where the places of worship are listed. Even today some of yous (if not most of yous) act if Doctors are like God.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 10:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <llnrta9g0sr4sfnms54ik1sp4g9rlr5v9t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361878 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 03:41:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:06:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><d3mptatngkoe4u5aiheufi5ksubp41qr9b@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:26:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:42:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><9d7ntad1bod3dnloidgh432ai3jp0v5v1f@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:59:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:57:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><sarjtadalabjesdhv3q5i1qohoqa4a0bjl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The definition of God as the living source and energy of all living things. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Occam's Razor violation by adding an unnecessary and unsupported >>>>>>>>>>>>>function to deities. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Gods are spirits detected by that small percentage of the population who >>>>>>>>>>>>>have direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>majority has always had no direct personal observation of the spirits if >>>>>>>>>>>>>the world so some take their existence on faith others disbelieve. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>God as a singluar being is a second Occam's razor violation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You have yet to offer any unambiguous and direct evidence any god ever >>>>>>>>>>>existed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>At this stage, what I would have to offer is totally over your head. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You do tend to pile it higher and deeper but I can hold my breath and >>>>>>>>>get a ladder. And a shovel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're in a hole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Not at all. >>>>>> >>>>>>You just accepted that you were. >>>>> >>>>>Amusing. >>>>> >>>>>I was discussing what you pile so high and deep. That smelly stuff. >>>> >>>>You had to get out of the crap to get a ladder so you could get out of the crap? >>>>Now I understand. >>> >>>As deep as you pile it a ladder is barely usable. >> >>Well, you're the one digging your way out of the crap. Personally you got >>yourself in it, so you get yourself out of it. But remember, it doesn't do any >>good to go get a ladder so you can dig yourself out of a hole of crap. >It's your crap. >I suspect your parents had a lot to do with your brainwashing when you >were growing up. If so that makes you the poster boy for considering >religious indoctrination child abuse. Did you get out of the hole so you could go get a ladder to get out of the hole. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 16:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <a99sta993pttu4hk04u2t3fsiauarnqfk6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361896 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:45:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <llnrta9g0sr4sfnms54ik1sp4g9rlr5v9t@4ax.com> wrote: >>>Well, you're the one digging your way out of the crap. Personally you got >>>yourself in it, so you get yourself out of it. But remember, it doesn't do any >>>good to go get a ladder so you can dig yourself out of a hole of crap. > >>It's your crap. >>I suspect your parents had a lot to do with your brainwashing when you >>were growing up. If so that makes you the poster boy for considering >>religious indoctrination child abuse. > >Did you get out of the hole so you could go get a ladder to get out of the hole. You are hung in one of your loops again. You have proven you can do this indefinitely. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <220uta5k1lc799e1kqd1evij7eq3mlsqv0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361926 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:45:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:45:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><llnrta9g0sr4sfnms54ik1sp4g9rlr5v9t@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>Well, you're the one digging your way out of the crap. Personally you got >>>>yourself in it, so you get yourself out of it. But remember, it doesn't do any >>>>good to go get a ladder so you can dig yourself out of a hole of crap. >> >>>It's your crap. >>>I suspect your parents had a lot to do with your brainwashing when you >>>were growing up. If so that makes you the poster boy for considering >>>religious indoctrination child abuse. >> >>Did you get out of the hole so you could go get a ladder to get out of the hole. > >You are hung in one of your loops again. You have proven you can do >this indefinitely. Truth is like that. It doesn't change. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqp6u5$ah8$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #360684 |
In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >> >> Um, what definition is that? > > By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > world of death. And what definition is _that_? -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #360954 |
On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>> >>> Um, what definition is that? >> >> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >> world of death. > > And what definition is _that_? It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of living will cease to exist. > > -- wds >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d3bj8sFag85U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #360976 |
On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Um, what definition is that? >>> >>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>> world of death. >> >> And what definition is _that_? > > It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of > living will cease to exist. <looks around> No god, and everything is still here...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #360996 |
On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: > On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>> >>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>> world of death. >>> >>> And what definition is _that_? >> >> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >> living will cease to exist. > > <looks around> > > No god, and everything is still here... The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's called a realization from the within.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itb3tapsfbkti28g2cgndc14k19p0dkfda@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361048 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>> >>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>> world of death. >>>> >>>> And what definition is _that_? >>> >>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>> living will cease to exist. >> >> <looks around> >> >> No god, and everything is still here... > >The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >called a realization from the within. It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361076 |
On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>> >>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>> world of death. >>>>> >>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>> >>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>> living will cease to exist. >>> >>> <looks around> >>> >>> No god, and everything is still here... >> >> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >> called a realization from the within. > > It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. Why？ Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was from the within? > > -- > Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. > > Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially > those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. > > Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government > guaranteed above average income for every person. > > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly > before you run into me. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v7p4talkqbn8j31s961hmht11oikhaoek8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361081 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:49:19 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>> >>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>> >>>> <looks around> >>>> >>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>> >>> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >>> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >>> called a realization from the within. >> >> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. > >Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >from the within? I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361140 |
On 2015-08-18 06:50 AM, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:49:19 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdi$7bt$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-17 05:56 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>> >>>>> <looks around> >>>>> >>>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>>> >>>> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >>>> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >>>> called a realization from the within. >>> >>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >> >> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>from the within? > > I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5fn5tahgjehhh0o2ip3hbkffu90qvri5m8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361166 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>> >>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>from the within? >> >> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. > >I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. That still holds true. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361171 |
On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>> >>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>> >from the within? >>> >>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >> >> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. > > As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever > existed. That still holds true. I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4sf8tap9a9com2ur4ta9ro498p65vl0frl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361247 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>> >>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>> >from the within? >>>> >>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>> >>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >> >> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >> existed. That still holds true. > >I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of history I would have long since been executed for heresy. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #361276 |
On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>> >from the within? >>>>> >>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>> >>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>> existed. That still holds true. >> >> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. > > But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of > history I would have long since been executed for heresy. Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here by being wilfully blind?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vi5btal4pmc4pcmcbn5en5rqrco730i6lr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361287 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:41:05 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr202n$ikl$4@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-19 04:35 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:26:37 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mr0hqp$2h7$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-18 03:26 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:33:08 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? Is it because no one ever told you that the spiritual world was >>>>>> >from the within? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. >>>>> >>>>> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >>>>> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >>>>> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. >>>> >>>> As I said, I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever >>>> existed. That still holds true. >>> >>> I'm afraid no one can force you to see what you don't want to see. >> >> But history shows that isn't from a lack of trying. For most of >> history I would have long since been executed for heresy. > >Irrelevant. Are you suggesting you are playing some kind of hero in here >by being wilfully blind? > > Not at all. It would be a bit difficult to do anything to me since I am not here physically. I am far from blind. I simply have not been brainwashed to accept that which has no supporting evidence. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web