Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360325 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 332 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 10:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 13:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 00:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-11 13:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 20:57 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-12 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 15:56 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:39 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:46 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:22 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:35 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:17 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:40 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 07:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:27 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 01:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 10:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 22:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 01:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 12:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 12:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 23:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 21:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 00:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 00:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 00:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 22:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 00:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-18 14:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 00:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 09:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 00:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 13:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 00:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 05:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:16 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:59 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 08:02 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-27 16:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-28 07:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:17 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:34 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 10:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:01 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 16:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:39 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 15:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:18 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-14 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-12 10:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 20:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800
Page 10 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 17 Next page →
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqkklu0kd5@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #360683 |
niunian wrote: > > Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. > It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this vaunted freedom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d36354Ft71kU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #360696 |
On 14/08/2015 12:50, talishi wrote: > niunian wrote: >> >> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical >> existence. > > It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this > vaunted freedom. Given how some Muslims choose to enter this blessed state, we should be thankful for such small mercy...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-DC7E67.06545914082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #360696 |
In article <mqkklu0kd5@news3.newsguy.com>, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > niunian wrote: > > > > Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. > > It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. > > It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this > vaunted freedom. Hence, the declaration that suicide will land you in hell. -- JD Išve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bcfssa5gn0qn5mf6l0hs4ngj4c0ceitcl8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360683 |
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >> >>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>> >>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >> >> WHy should death be evil? > >Because killing life is evil. yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for all of those also, I guess you are just fucked > >> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >> growth. Death is *good*. >> > >Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy that god of yours
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqmckh$1cg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #360760 |
On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>> >>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>> >>> WHy should death be evil? >> >> Because killing life is evil. > > yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more > people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets > credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than > hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for > all of those also, I guess you are just fucked > >> >>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>> growth. Death is *good*. >>> >> >> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. > > hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, > drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy > that god of yours > Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1459346691461313425.308533mike-xenocyte.com@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #360825 |
niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: > On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>>> >>>> WHy should death be evil? >>> >>> Because killing life is evil. >> >> yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more >> people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets >> credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than >> hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for >> all of those also, I guess you are just fucked >> >>> >>>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>>> growth. Death is *good*. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >>> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. >> >> hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, >> drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy >> that god of yours >> > > Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from > the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living > only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of > nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things > does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed > himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing. I'm trying to figure out whether your religion has anything to do with any established ones, and failing. Certainly not Judaism, Christianity or Islam - to name just three of the ones that embrace the notion that God erased most of the life on Earth in a flood so he could start afresh ... -- So much universe, and so little time. - Sir Terry Pratchett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqn36b$5ht$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #360837 |
On 2015-08-15 02:41 PM, Mike M wrote: > niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >> On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>>>> >>>>> WHy should death be evil? >>>> >>>> Because killing life is evil. >>> >>> yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more >>> people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets >>> credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than >>> hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for >>> all of those also, I guess you are just fucked >>> >>>> >>>>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>>>> growth. Death is *good*. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >>>> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. >>> >>> hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, >>> drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy >>> that god of yours >>> >> >> Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from >> the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living >> only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of >> nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things >> does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed >> himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing. > > I'm trying to figure out whether your religion has anything to do with any > established ones, and failing. Certainly not Judaism, Christianity or Islam > - to name just three of the ones that embrace the notion that God erased > most of the life on Earth in a flood so he could start afresh ... > The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the place of the previous creation God.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqn4pp1c16@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #360856 |
niunian wrote: > > The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God of > creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of Adam and > Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of living, the > giver of life who is always good. The second God is the God of sin who > is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same God. The sin has > introduced or manufactured another God in the place of the previous > creation God. It turns out the previous creation God was manufactured as well. Humans have manufactured at least 5,000 of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqn5c6$cgg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #360859 |
On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > niunian wrote: >> >> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God >> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of >> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of >> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the >> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same >> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the >> place of the previous creation God. > > It turns out the previous creation God was manufactured as well. > Humans have manufactured at least 5,000 of them. Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up your mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqnj5v02v2s@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #360862 |
niunian wrote: > On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: >> niunian wrote: >>> >>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God >>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of >>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of >>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the >>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same >>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the >>> place of the previous creation God. >> >> It turns out the previous creation God was manufactured as well. >> Humans have manufactured at least 5,000 of them. > > Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > your mind. We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and went out trying to kill "Harkonnens".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqnrhb$437$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #360877 |
On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > niunian wrote: >> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: >>> niunian wrote: >>>> >>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God >>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of >>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of >>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the >>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same >>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the >>>> place of the previous creation God. >> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up >> your mind. > > We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". you don't "know" that. Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t5jvsa5rj0llcorbgaf2gsv4uihl3m2hmk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360903 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: >> niunian wrote: >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: >>>> niunian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up >>> your mind. >> >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > >you don't "know" that. >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D0423E.777F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #360935 |
bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > wrote: > > >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > >> niunian wrote: > >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > >>>> niunian wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God > >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of > >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of > >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the > >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same > >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the > >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > > > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > >>> your mind. > >> > >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > > > >you don't "know" that. > >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. > > well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but > atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. That's not true... 'the scientific community' who the majority are atheist.. read fairy tales and science fiction. (which are both fabricated fiction stories) How many times have the 'scientific community' used words from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? 'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? "flying saucers"? just fairy tales. Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. "This porridge is too cold," she said So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. "Ahhh, this porridge is just right," Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D044EE.32EA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #360957 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > > wrote: > > > > >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > > >> niunian wrote: > > >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > > >>>> niunian wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God > > >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of > > >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of > > >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the > > >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same > > >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the > > >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > > > > > > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > > >>> your mind. > > >> > > >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > > >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > > >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > > >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > > > > > >you don't "know" that. > > >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. > > > > well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but > > atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. > > That's not true... > 'the scientific community' who > the majority are atheist.. > read fairy tales and science fiction. > (which are both fabricated fiction stories) > > How many times have the 'scientific community' used words > from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? > > 'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. > > They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? > > "flying saucers"? just fairy tales. > > Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! > > The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in > other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... > there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. > > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. > > So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. > > "This porridge is too cold," she said > > So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. > > "Ahhh, this porridge is just right," > > Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale. .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D0452E.1D7F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #360963 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > > > >> niunian wrote: > > > >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > > > >>>> niunian wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God > > > >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of > > > >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of > > > >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the > > > >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same > > > >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the > > > >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > > > >>> your mind. > > > >> > > > >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > > > >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > > > >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > > > >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > > > > > > > >you don't "know" that. > > > >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. > > > > > > well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but > > > atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. > > > > That's not true... > > 'the scientific community' who > > the majority are atheist.. > > read fairy tales and science fiction. > > (which are both fabricated fiction stories) > > > > How many times have the 'scientific community' used words > > from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? > > > > 'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. > > > > They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? > > > > "flying saucers"? just fairy tales. > > > > Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! > > > > The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in > > other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... > > there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. > > > > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. > > > > So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. > > > > "This porridge is too cold," she said > > > > So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. > > > > "Ahhh, this porridge is just right," > > > > Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale. > > . .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D0FB67.56A1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #360965 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > > > > >> niunian wrote: > > > > >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > > > > >>>> niunian wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God > > > > >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of > > > > >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of > > > > >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the > > > > >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same > > > > >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the > > > > >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > > > > >>> your mind. > > > > >> > > > > >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > > > > >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > > > > >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > > > > >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > > > > > > > > > >you don't "know" that. > > > > >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. > > > > > > > > well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but > > > > atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. > > > > > > That's not true... > > > 'the scientific community' who > > > the majority are atheist.. > > > read fairy tales and science fiction. > > > (which are both fabricated fiction stories) > > > > > > How many times have the 'scientific community' used words > > > from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? > > > > > > 'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. > > > > > > They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? > > > > > > "flying saucers"? just fairy tales. > > > > > > Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! > > > > > > The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in > > > other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... > > > there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. > > > > > > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. > > > > > > So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. > > > > > > "This porridge is too cold," she said > > > > > > So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. > > > > > > "Ahhh, this porridge is just right," > > > > > > Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale. In other words... Martians are just a fabricated being created by science fiction fairy tales. It's fantasty. There are no Martians, ....only Atheist believe in Martians. God created only one Earth....with earthlings. People from other planets are just...fairy tales. Wasn't it H.G. Wells the one who invented the word ...Martians???? Adult fairy tales.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t2c3ta5e9nbe9vdh0q43vbrkemgqr9bptt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361035 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:06:47 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <55D0FB67.56A1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >In other words... > >Martians are just a fabricated being created by science fiction fairy tales. It's fantasty. Probably. > >There are no Martians, ....only Atheist believe in Martians. Belief is irrelevant. We know enough about Mars to preclude any advanced life being there. > >God created only one Earth....with earthlings. What evidence supports that? > >People from other planets are just...fairy tales. It's a big universe, and there are a lot of planets out there. There is no way you can assert that with any kind of supporting evidence. It's even a poor opinion. > > >Wasn't it H.G. Wells the one who invented the word ...Martians???? It was used by several sources, including fiction, long before Wells. > > >Adult fairy tales. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2323A.68C1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #361035 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: > > > > > >> niunian wrote: > > > > > >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: > > > > > >>>> niunian wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God > > > > > >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of > > > > > >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of > > > > > >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the > > > > > >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same > > > > > >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the > > > > > >>>>> place of the previous creation God. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up > > > > > >>> your mind. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and > > > > > >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as > > > > > >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and > > > > > >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". > > > > > > > > > > > >you don't "know" that. > > > > > >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. > > > > > > > > > > well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but > > > > > atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. > > > > > > > > That's not true... > > > > 'the scientific community' who > > > > the majority are atheist.. > > > > read fairy tales and science fiction. > > > > (which are both fabricated fiction stories) > > > > > > > > How many times have the 'scientific community' used words > > > > from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? > > > > > > > > 'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. > > > > > > > > They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? > > > > > > > > "flying saucers"? just fairy tales. > > > > > > > > Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! > > > > > > > > The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in > > > > other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... > > > > there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. > > > > > > > > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. > > > > > > > > So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. > > > > > > > > "This porridge is too cold," she said > > > > > > > > So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. > > > > > > > > "Ahhh, this porridge is just right," > > > > > > > > Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale. > > In other words... > > Martians are just a fabricated being created by science fiction fairy tales. It's fantasty. > > There are no Martians, ....only Atheist believe in Martians. > > God created only one Earth....with earthlings. > > People from other planets are just...fairy tales. > > Wasn't it H.G. Wells the one who invented the word ...Martians???? > > Adult fairy tales. http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/08/15/apollo-14-astronaut-claims-peace-loving-aliens-prevented-nuclear-war-on-earth/ astro-nuts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tsi0tat3q0411qe3clk0lel5ol8i4g43v9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360957 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:56:46 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> >> wrote: >> >> >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote: >> >> niunian wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote: >> >>>> niunian wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God >> >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of >> >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of >> >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the >> >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same >> >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the >> >>>>> place of the previous creation God. >> > >> > >> >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up >> >>> your mind. >> >> >> >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and >> >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as >> >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and >> >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens". >> > >> >you don't "know" that. >> >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists. >> >> well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but >> atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do. > >That's not true... >'the scientific community' who >the majority are atheist.. >read fairy tales and science fiction. >(which are both fabricated fiction stories) > >How many times have the 'scientific community' used words >from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales? > >'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales. > >They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from? > >"flying saucers"? just fairy tales. > >Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them! > > >The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in >other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read... >there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets. > > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed. > >So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl. > >"This porridge is too cold," she said > >So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge. > >"Ahhh, this porridge is just right," > > > > >Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale. no response even needed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D16228.19ED@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #360968 |
bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:56:46 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >bilgat@m.nu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:05:31 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 8/15/2015 9:43 AM, talishi wrote:
> >> >> niunian wrote:
> >> >>> On 2015-08-15 06:36 PM, talishi wrote:
> >> >>>> niunian wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God
> >> >>>>> of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of
> >> >>>>> Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of
> >> >>>>> living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the
> >> >>>>> God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same
> >> >>>>> God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the
> >> >>>>> place of the previous creation God.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>> Are we talking about philosophy or are we talking about science? Make up
> >> >>> your mind.
> >> >>
> >> >> We are talking about a unique form of literature that historically (and
> >> >> even in the present day) translated to terrible physical action such as
> >> >> war and beheadings. Certainly no one ever took "Dune" as scripture and
> >> >> went out trying to kill "Harkonnens".
> >> >
> >> >you don't "know" that.
> >> >Lots of people believe in "Dune" especially Atheists.
> >>
> >> well as an atheist I can tell you that it was a damn good book, but
> >> atheists dont believe in fairy tale books like theists do.
> >
> >That's not true...
> >'the scientific community' who
> >the majority are atheist..
> >read fairy tales and science fiction.
> >(which are both fabricated fiction stories)
> >
> >How many times have the 'scientific community' used words
> >from "Goldilocks" fairy tales, or H.G. Wells tales?
> >
> >'the scientific community' live and breathe fairy tales.
> >
> >They believe that life exist on other planets. Where did they get that idea from?
> >
> >"flying saucers"? just fairy tales.
> >
> >Life on Mars?? They won't quit until you shoot them!
> >
> >
> >The only reason the 'scientific community' believes in life in
> >other planets is because of those science fiction fairy tales they read...
> >there is no other logical reason to believe in life on other planets.
> >
> > "This porridge is too hot!" she exclaimed.
> >
> >So, she tasted the porridge from the second bowl.
> >
> >"This porridge is too cold," she said
> >
> >So, she tasted the last bowl of porridge.
> >
> >"Ahhh, this porridge is just right,"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Okay, I'm going to break the atheist bubble....there are no Martians....never was. It's just a fairy tale.
>
> no response even needed
There are atheist members in the 'scienticic community' who don't believe in God but believe in...flying saucers.
Is there a name for that insanity?
.
o . | o
. . -O- .
. o __\/__ |
/ .-. \ o .
==== / (c"}) \
=== _/__`(_)'_\_\_ . o
==== (______________)
// || \\ o .
o OO OO OO
. . o
| o . .
-O-
o | o .
.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web