Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362253

Re: parallel universe

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: parallel universe
Date 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
Message-ID <d4e84eF3jpU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <55E015E1.7C66@ix.netcom.com> <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com> <charlie-gordon1492-5BCF3F.01133129082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 29.08.2015 18:30, schrieb The Starmaker:

>>>> So, when I see members
>>>> of the 'scientific community' talking
>>>> about parallel universe...they are talking about
>>>> a subject invented by the
>>>> science fiction community.
>>>
>>> It depends whether they are just speculating or if they think actually think
>>> there is evidence for anything outside this universe. Speculation is the
>>> precursor to hypothesis which begets theory.
>>
>> It is a speculation that first came from science fiction community, not the 'scientific community'.
>>
>> I understand it's unobservable, not tested...but doesn't even come from the 'scientific community' as a theory.
>>
>> Cause it is an invention of 'the science fiction community'.
>>
>> Parallel Universe is a science fiction theory, not a science non-fiction theory.
>>
>> It comes from science fiction. It is borne from science fiction.
>>
>> There is no Science theory like this:
>> http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782
>
>
> To put it simply...
> Parallel Universe is a speculation that first came from 'the science fiction community', not the 'scientific community'.

I had an idea about an 'universe around the corner'.

I assume, that time behaves like an axis and we (together with our 
universe) perform some kind of movement along this imaginary axis.

This we can't see, since we regard this movement as time, while the 
remote events are separated in space.

It we take the line towards such a remote event as new axis of time, we 
would see a different universe. And this is not parallel, but has an 
angle, since its axis of time is in our world the path of light.

In that other universe we (on this planet) are invisible, since we 
belong to the past of an observer moving along such a path.

This effect is actually, what relativity is dealing with. If you think 
about velocity as angle in spacetime, the velocity c is the angle of 
45°. If you turn to this angle, you are actually moving with c in 
respect to some other object (say: planet Earth).

This will make the Earth drop behind the event horizon, while another 
universe opens.

But the object moving along such a tilted axis does not regard its own 
movement as movement in space. The object regards itself as at rest and 
centres the universe around itself.

This is at least what we humans do with our universe. We see ourselves 
as at the centre and measure distance in respect to us.

Most likely all other possible observers would do the same, but would 
see a different universe. And these universes are not parallel, since 
they have a different axis of time, standing in an angle to each other.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
  Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
    Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
      Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
        Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
        Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
          Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
            Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
              Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
              Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
                Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
  Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:16 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:35 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 07:07 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 10:17 -0700

csiph-web