Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362304

Re: parallel universe

Message-ID <55E2A60E.4CF8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written
Subject Re: parallel universe
References (4 earlier) <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com> <mrtkg8$vg9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <charlie-gordon1492-816D66.18402629082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <mrttis$g7i$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


gilber34 wrote:
> 
> On 8/29/2015 8:40 PM, je suis charly wrote:
> > In article <mrtkg8$vg9$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> How can a universe tell if it is parallel to something outside it ?
> >>
> >> It cannot.
> >>
> >> Therefore, there cannot be "parallel universes".
> 
> > No. Lack of evidence does not prove anything. At this time we have no evidence
> > of other universes, so it is speculation.
> >
> >> Therefore, all parallel universes intersect, and form a continuum a
> >> super universe.
> 
> > Parallel objects never intersect. Intersecting objects do not have to be
> > positionned on top of each other.
> >
> >> and therefore, there is only one universe.
> 
> > Non sequitur. There is evidence of one universe, and no evidence for or against
> > other universes. Therefore this universe exists and other universes are
> > currently speculative.
> >
> 
> Or they intersect with this one, therefore are part of it, so there is
> only one universe.
> 
> The main point is that a universe cannot "know" it is parallel to
> something outside it.  As a universe consists of all known to it, to be
> contained inside it, and nothing is known, and cannot be known, outside
> of it.  True ?


Whether or not parallel universe exist, certaintly the universe "knows"
of it's self..the universe is..'aware'.

The universe has it's own...consciousness.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
  Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
    Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
      Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
        Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
        Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
          Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
            Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
              Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
              Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
                Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
  Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:16 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:35 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 07:07 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 10:17 -0700

csiph-web