Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362250
| Message-ID | <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: parallel universe |
| References | <JrOdnfa8LPlVOULInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <55E015E1.7C66@ix.netcom.com> <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com> <charlie-gordon1492-5BCF3F.01133129082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > je suis charly wrote: > > > > In article <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com>, > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > tony wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What are some of the earliest parallel universe stories? > > > > > > > > if you're talking about books there is: The Lathe of Heaven > > > > > > > > if you're talking about other stuff stories: > > > > http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782 > > > > > > > > > But what most people don't know is that.. > > > parallel universe is an invention by > > > the science fiction community, not the > > > scientific community. > > > > To be fair spacecraft also showed up first in the science fiction of Johannes > > Kepler. > > > > > So, when I see members > > > of the 'scientific community' talking > > > about parallel universe...they are talking about > > > a subject invented by the > > > science fiction community. > > > > It depends whether they are just speculating or if they think actually think > > there is evidence for anything outside this universe. Speculation is the > > precursor to hypothesis which begets theory. > > It is a speculation that first came from science fiction community, not the 'scientific community'. > > I understand it's unobservable, not tested...but doesn't even come from the 'scientific community' as a theory. > > Cause it is an invention of 'the science fiction community'. > > Parallel Universe is a science fiction theory, not a science non-fiction theory. > > It comes from science fiction. It is borne from science fiction. > > There is no Science theory like this: > http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782 To put it simply... Parallel Universe is a speculation that first came from 'the science fiction community', not the 'scientific community'.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:16 -0700
Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:35 -0700
Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 07:07 -0700
Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 10:17 -0700
csiph-web