Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362720

Re: parallel universe

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 30.08.2015 02:58, schrieb gilber34:
> On 8/29/2015 11:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> je suis charly wrote:
>>>>
>
>>> Parallel Universe is a science fiction theory, not a science
>>> non-fiction theory.
>>>
>>> It comes from science fiction. It is borne from science fiction.
>>>
>>> There is no Science theory like this:
>>> http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782
>>
>>
>> To put it simply... Parallel Universe is a speculation that first
>> came from 'the science fiction community', not the 'scientific
>> community'.
>>
>
> How can a universe tell if it is parallel to something outside it ?
>
> It cannot.
>
> Therefore, there cannot be "parallel universes".
>
> Therefore, all parallel universes intersect, and form a continuum a
> super universe.
>
> and therefore, there is only one universe.

The term 'universe' is commonly used for what we see in the remoteness 
of the night-sky.

But this is NOT the 'real thing'. It is more or less an image. This 
image stems from the delay caused by the speed of light.

This delay brings more remote events later into vision than closer. 
Since we see an image as a whole, we see things together, that to not 
belong together.

So, our view on the universe is not 'real', but real only to us. This 
'universe' is in fact special to us, since any observer anywhere would 
see things in a different way, hence would regard his view upon the 
universe as unique and therefore would see a different one.

This is, of course, an optical illusion, but inevitable, since light is 
not that fast (in comparison to the wast extensions of space).

Now there are other changes possible, and that is a change of the 'axis 
of time'.

If you regard the cosmic timeline (from big-bang to us now) as an 
'axis', this axis is also special to us.

E.g. we could think about an opposite direction and what is our past is 
the future there.

This would bring also VERY different stars into the sky and the world 
from such a view would look extremely different.

But even stranger would be, if this axis has an angle and what is a day 
to us is a second there (or a year).

So, if we would rotate the timeline, the 'universe' would also change.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
  Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
    Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
      Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
        Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
        Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
          Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
            Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
              Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
              Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
                Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
  Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:16 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 05:35 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 07:07 -0700
    Re: parallel universe fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 10:17 -0700

csiph-web