Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: parallel universe Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:23:19 +0200 Lines: 65 Message-ID: References: <55E015E1.7C66@ix.netcom.com> <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com> <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net hMLGh1QpiAK0lD/iYXXwiA31Oko2wmXwbPX4f3m/RipCEUL0e9 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6Xm94ZXG1/RQzB+3NYimMqx1Pmo= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com> Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:421480 sci.physics:517667 sci.physics.relativity:362253 alt.astronomy:274285 Am 29.08.2015 18:30, schrieb The Starmaker: >>>> So, when I see members >>>> of the 'scientific community' talking >>>> about parallel universe...they are talking about >>>> a subject invented by the >>>> science fiction community. >>> >>> It depends whether they are just speculating or if they think actually think >>> there is evidence for anything outside this universe. Speculation is the >>> precursor to hypothesis which begets theory. >> >> It is a speculation that first came from science fiction community, not the 'scientific community'. >> >> I understand it's unobservable, not tested...but doesn't even come from the 'scientific community' as a theory. >> >> Cause it is an invention of 'the science fiction community'. >> >> Parallel Universe is a science fiction theory, not a science non-fiction theory. >> >> It comes from science fiction. It is borne from science fiction. >> >> There is no Science theory like this: >> http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782 > > > To put it simply... > Parallel Universe is a speculation that first came from 'the science fiction community', not the 'scientific community'. I had an idea about an 'universe around the corner'. I assume, that time behaves like an axis and we (together with our universe) perform some kind of movement along this imaginary axis. This we can't see, since we regard this movement as time, while the remote events are separated in space. It we take the line towards such a remote event as new axis of time, we would see a different universe. And this is not parallel, but has an angle, since its axis of time is in our world the path of light. In that other universe we (on this planet) are invisible, since we belong to the past of an observer moving along such a path. This effect is actually, what relativity is dealing with. If you think about velocity as angle in spacetime, the velocity c is the angle of 45°. If you turn to this angle, you are actually moving with c in respect to some other object (say: planet Earth). This will make the Earth drop behind the event horizon, while another universe opens. But the object moving along such a tilted axis does not regard its own movement as movement in space. The object regards itself as at rest and centres the universe around itself. This is at least what we humans do with our universe. We see ourselves as at the centre and measure distance in respect to us. Most likely all other possible observers would do the same, but would see a different universe. And these universes are not parallel, since they have a different axis of time, standing in an angle to each other. TH