Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517811
| Message-ID | <55E2A60E.4CF8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: parallel universe |
| References | (4 earlier) <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> <55E1DE36.3A26@ix.netcom.com> <mrtkg8$vg9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <charlie-gordon1492-816D66.18402629082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <mrttis$g7i$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
gilber34 wrote: > > On 8/29/2015 8:40 PM, je suis charly wrote: > > In article <mrtkg8$vg9$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> > > wrote: > > > >> How can a universe tell if it is parallel to something outside it ? > >> > >> It cannot. > >> > >> Therefore, there cannot be "parallel universes". > > > No. Lack of evidence does not prove anything. At this time we have no evidence > > of other universes, so it is speculation. > > > >> Therefore, all parallel universes intersect, and form a continuum a > >> super universe. > > > Parallel objects never intersect. Intersecting objects do not have to be > > positionned on top of each other. > > > >> and therefore, there is only one universe. > > > Non sequitur. There is evidence of one universe, and no evidence for or against > > other universes. Therefore this universe exists and other universes are > > currently speculative. > > > > Or they intersect with this one, therefore are part of it, so there is > only one universe. > > The main point is that a universe cannot "know" it is parallel to > something outside it. As a universe consists of all known to it, to be > contained inside it, and nothing is known, and cannot be known, outside > of it. True ? Whether or not parallel universe exist, certaintly the universe "knows" of it's self..the universe is..'aware'. The universe has it's own...consciousness.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
Re: parallel universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:01 -0700
Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
Re: parallel universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:09 -0700
csiph-web