Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1353100
| From | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] |
| Date | 2016-03-08 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <raqXL-25J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <raffX-2Pc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8ZwB-8vJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8ZwC-8vJ-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rapIn-1lO-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 13:13 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > but we're left with a lot of references to "system_trusted" (eg. > > restrict_link_to_system_trusted, depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING > > How about I pluralise it to SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRINGS? The fact that one is > called builtin and the other secondary doesn't detract from the fact that > they're both system-wide rings of trusted keys. Would then restrict_link_to_system_trusted imply both the builtin and secondary keyrings or just the builtin keyrings? Changing the system keyring name to builtin keys, without changing the corresponding restrict_link name, obfuscates what is really happening. Mimi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 00/12] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 04/12] KEYS: Move x509_request_asymmetric_key() to asymmetric_type.c [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 03:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-03-08 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-03-08 16:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-03-08 17:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 15:20 +0100
[RFC PATCH 07/12] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 03:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 14:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-03-08 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 16:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2] Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100
[RFC PATCH 05/12] KEYS: Generalise x509_request_asymmetric_key() [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 09/12] KEYS: Move the point of trust determination to __key_link() [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 02/12] PKCS#7: Make trust determination dependent on contents of trust keyring [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 06/12] X.509: Use verify_signature() if we have a struct key * to use [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 10/12] KEYS: Remove KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED and KEY_ALLOC_TRUSTED [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-03-04 16:10 +0100
csiph-web