Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250167
| From | Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context |
| Date | 2015-10-18 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qkZa1-2hf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <qjzrj-7fk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjBWa-2yn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjC5Q-2Mx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkWlQ-6D8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkYQF-1UT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
18.10.2015 19:12, Andy Lutomirski пишет: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote: >> 15.10.2015 00:41, Andy Lutomirski пишет: >>>> If this my >>>> understanding is correct and the flag is just an indication rather >>>> than a requested action, perhaps the name should be different, >>>> e.g. UC_SIG_FROM_32BIT or the like? >>>> Anyway, this is minor. :) >>>> I'll try to test the patch within a few days, thanks for you time! >>> No problem. Thanks for being willing to test! >> Hello Andy, I am unlucky at testing this. >> dosemu doesn't even start for me on the git kernels. >> After a half day of debugging, it seems the kernel forgets >> to fill in the "err" field in the sigcontext struct when >> page fault occurs. That confuses the dosemu's instruction >> decoder. >> Does this ring any bells? > No, but I can reproduce it on some kernels. Let me see if I can fix it, too. Thanks! You should really consider adding dosemu as your test-case. It feels very unhappy on all recent kernels. I was getting hard lock-ups under different circumstances (when starting windows, for example). But fedora-packaged kernels are quite good, as of yet. I fear the problems will soon populate to them too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/4] x86: sigcontext SS fixes, take 2 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-13 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 23:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-18 15:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-18 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-18 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-18 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-18 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-18 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:10 +0200
[RFC 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
csiph-web