Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1246998

Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context

From Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context
Date 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Message-ID <qjxpv-4ki-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qiWgi-7NK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiWgj-7NK-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjxpv-4ki-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:04:07PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> ...
>>
>> For the benefit of new 64-bit software that uses segmentation (new
>> versions of DOSEMU might), the new behavior can be detected with a
>> new ucontext flag UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS.
>>
>> To avoid compilation issues, __pad0 is left as an alias for ss in
>> ucontext.
>>
>> The nitty-gritty details are documented in the header file.
>>
>> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>
> Andy, so for old criu versions (prior the 1.5.1 which is Mar 2015,
> in next versions we already write proper ss into the images)
> we've been providing __pad = 0, which is ss in a new meaning,
> and the kernel will overwrite it with @user-ds after this series,
> correct? This should work for us. Stas, mind to refresh my memory,
> which ss value doesmu setups here?

That's the intent.

If you write __pad = 0, don't set UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS, and leave cs
set to a 64-bit value, then the kernel will detect that 0 is not a
valid SS and will fix it for you.

If you do write UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS (e.g. if you saved on a new
kernel and you restore the saved uc_flags), then you'll get a new
signal delivered.

If you're restoring a 32-bit or 16-bit context, then none of the above
applies, but I doubt that CRIU supports that anyway.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC 0/4] x86: sigcontext SS fixes, take 2 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
  [RFC 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
  [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-13 18:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 17:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 20:10 +0200
            Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 20:40 +0200
              Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 21:00 +0200
                Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200
                Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 23:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit  signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:10 +0200
  [RFC 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200

csiph-web