Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1246998
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context |
| Date | 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjxpv-4ki-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qiWgi-7NK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiWgj-7NK-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjxpv-4ki-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:04:07PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > ... >> >> For the benefit of new 64-bit software that uses segmentation (new >> versions of DOSEMU might), the new behavior can be detected with a >> new ucontext flag UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS. >> >> To avoid compilation issues, __pad0 is left as an alias for ss in >> ucontext. >> >> The nitty-gritty details are documented in the header file. >> >> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> >> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> >> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> > > Andy, so for old criu versions (prior the 1.5.1 which is Mar 2015, > in next versions we already write proper ss into the images) > we've been providing __pad = 0, which is ss in a new meaning, > and the kernel will overwrite it with @user-ds after this series, > correct? This should work for us. Stas, mind to refresh my memory, > which ss value doesmu setups here? That's the intent. If you write __pad = 0, don't set UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS, and leave cs set to a 64-bit value, then the kernel will detect that 0 is not a valid SS and will fix it for you. If you do write UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS (e.g. if you saved on a new kernel and you restore the saved uc_flags), then you'll get a new signal delivered. If you're restoring a 32-bit or 16-bit context, then none of the above applies, but I doubt that CRIU supports that anyway. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/4] x86: sigcontext SS fixes, take 2 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-13 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 23:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:10 +0200
[RFC 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
csiph-web