Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1247007
| From | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context |
| Date | 2015-10-14 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjxIS-4Xf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qiWgi-7NK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiWgj-7NK-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjxpv-4ki-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjxzc-4vK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:57:02PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: ... > > correct? This should work for us. Stas, mind to refresh my memory, > > which ss value doesmu setups here? > > Nothing. > Older dosemus didn't care about touching __pad0, so > whatever kernel saves there, is still there, even when > dosemu needs another value. > The problem starts to happen IIRC when dosemu invalidates > the LDT entry that was previously saved by the kernel as an SS. > IIRC this was causing the SIGSEGV right from sigreturn(). > It is actually a bit annoying to have such bad code in kernel > only for the sake of the older dosemu. I see. Thanks a huge for info! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/4] x86: sigcontext SS fixes, take 2 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
[RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-13 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 23:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-14 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2015-10-14 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 19:10 +0200
[RFC 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 03:10 +0200
csiph-web