Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14723

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?
Date Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:10:02 +0100
Message-ID <FCaoy-amiP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FC0Sf-agdq-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FC9C9-alMw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FCaeR-alZR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 13 10:06:52 2022
Old-Return-Path <mitya57@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.48 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-lj1-f175.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State ANoB5pnmY89FgqVVvpQT2m2knQWyVOF/hdl3CRVz2dFn1cijklQw6mOm nvwrWOicTs1RoVnJV7Z1n++9VeAzmiTQRQ==
X-Google-SMTP-Source AA0mqf5D+suXoQPhcuskUVPTmIYcRR9iTx+LF6vlwranmI3442Yv4OTAKGIAqdMEu3T6mHONx0Ieug==
X-Received by 2002:a2e:9a87:0:b0:279:e300:8f91 with SMTP id p7-20020a2e9a87000000b00279e3008f91mr6608876lji.43.1670925992145; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:06:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y3TOICJFK/1HZsuk"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20589
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Y5hOpbrF/+Rc4LNm@mitya57.me
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 64
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:06:29 +0300
X-Original-Message-ID <Y5hOpbrF/+Rc4LNm@mitya57.me>
X-Original-References <CAM8zJQutSSUGjSRjK+jEzd6XMtMTFBrM6dPPKpUcbnexTKADSw@mail.gmail.com> <20221213091537.wovnxc44yzietsls@mail.gaussglocke.de> <4a7a4d174aaf4df2a518518b86e6be76@posteo.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14723

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi all,

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:15:37AM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> One remaining problem is the unmaintained nose package, which is not
> compatible with Python 3.11 and still a dependency of 200+ packages,
> including ~40 key packages [1]. I've seen that crusoe has done some work
> patching up nose, but AFAICT it is not building yet.
>
> Is this something we can resolve in time, either by fixing nose or
> removing it altogether?

I will try to fix nose. The remaining problem is just failing doctest.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 09:57:57AM +0000, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
> This question is just for my learning: Why is nose patched? Upstream nose is
> unmaintained for years.
>
> I understand that you cannot drop nose from Debian in the current situation
> of a freeze in one months and so many dependencies.
>
> But isn't there a Debian process/workflow to "warn" package maintainers
> about an upcoming package drop of one of there dependend packages to put
> some pressure into it? Looking into the list of over 200 packages I see this
> also as a chance to clean out some other unmaintained (and maybe not so
> important) packages from the Debian repo.

There are bugs filed against every package:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=nose-rm

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100

csiph-web