Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14210

Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?)
Date Sun, 03 Jul 2022 00:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <EEU65-8JLI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jul 2 22:49:40 2022
Old-Return-Path <073plan@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-9.354 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-qt1-f175.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AJIora/W5G6lBA7rBL+21fuZqwA6EGxf8A8CAkrmBdnuIcGUbrMesXKS 9lttKTs90GXj+8pD+4X2h4LhQbF4kwI=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AGRyM1sPbzllIFcOt1Mh6yfXDAJ7W7g7TAYjHhxg7iwop6SVO1JXCI/ZpqJiO4HbVM81t4D9RLl0VA==
X-Received by 2002:a05:622a:48a:b0:31b:f2d6:a6c7 with SMTP id p10-20020a05622a048a00b0031bf2d6a6c7mr18282954qtx.605.1656802165779; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
Organization Debian Project
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qwMOIs9uwGBRtNqqbvxs"
User-Agent Evolution 3.44.2-1
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20040
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4ff03efd54183b465cd3a0a3fbf6db60f2b52f66.camel@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 54
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sat, 02 Jul 2022 18:49:23 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <4ff03efd54183b465cd3a0a3fbf6db60f2b52f66.camel@debian.org>
X-Original-References <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14210

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi all,

在 2022-06-28星期二的 09:24 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道：
> Hi all,
> 
> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
> 
> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
> what
> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!

As an update, I also pushed pdm package [3] as well as several of its build-
dependencies into the NEW queue.

[3] http://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web