Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14201

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

Path	csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date	Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:40:03 +0200
Message-ID	<EDjBF-7NuN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 28 13:33:12 2022
Old-Return-Path	<stefano@rivera.za.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-107.227 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.356, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6
Mail-Followup-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Gpg-Public-Key	http://www.rivera.za.net/stefano.gpg
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
User-Agent	NeoMutt/20201127
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20030
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20220628133255.cpghnmzky37etuso@satie.tumbleweed.org.za
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	17
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:32:55 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<20220628133255.cpghnmzky37etuso@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
X-Original-References	<758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14201

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Boyuan (2022.06.28_13:24:49_+0000)
> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself.

Yes, probably time to package it.

Bootstrapping shouldn't be problematic, PEP517 includes support for
bootstrapping (backend-path = ["."]), so backends can build themselves
from their own source trees.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web