Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14205

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <EDHkB-81Ic-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDjBF-7NuN-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 29 14:59:08 2022
Old-Return-Path <073plan@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-9.354 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AJIora//3tB9m+Qb7aLt7XXt/1GvuTyxeNTilu5qohBl6e3oTcs/DlWn TkrIHHIj6pP3Lcu83MC6L5I=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AGRyM1tqLrUX1Eo36zIhjUbAY3JzmPeWb/d6q4i6vyOw5jVc5uWuG6N2xq/tDE/PO2ZZkDfIvbyEgQ==
X-Received by 2002:a05:622a:58d:b0:317:ca0d:91a5 with SMTP id c13-20020a05622a058d00b00317ca0d91a5mr2703004qtb.601.1656514731376; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2WC7IXtY6plkI9+7VMuk"
User-Agent Evolution 3.44.2-1
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20035
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4315374155e7935d682d31a13153e5889e9f704d.camel@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 59
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:58:48 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <4315374155e7935d682d31a13153e5889e9f704d.camel@debian.org>
X-Original-References <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <20220628133255.cpghnmzky37etuso@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14205

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

在 2022-06-28星期二的 13:32 +0000,Stefano Rivera写道:
> Hi Boyuan (2022.06.28_13:24:49_+0000)
> > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself.
> 
> Yes, probably time to package it.
> 
> Bootstrapping shouldn't be problematic, PEP517 includes support for
> bootstrapping (backend-path = ["."]), so backends can build themselves
> from their own source trees.

Thanks. I have uploaded an initial version to the NEW queue. The packaging
work is at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/ .

It is worth noting that I took the very aggressive way in stripping every
vendored libraries, see
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm-pep517/-/tree/master/debian/patches
. This may not be ideal since the patch will need human intervention for every
new upstream release, but anyway let's have a working version in Sid first.
Meanwhile, any review or other types of help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web