Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60058
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: SLAB vs. SLUB |
| Date | Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:40:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vbbEe-5Ms-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v9mkp-8t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vbaIa-5dF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 23 18:33:09 2018 |
| Old-Return-Path | <waldi@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-9.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| Mail-Followup-To | debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| User-Agent | NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/115574 |
| List-ID | <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180123181558.zshco4hsb23igkh6@shell.thinkmo.de |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 17 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:15:59 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20180123181558.zshco4hsb23igkh6@shell.thinkmo.de> |
| X-Original-References | <20180118171808.6udpsrguey3lkaro@shell.thinkmo.de> <1516729064.5097.88.camel@decadent.org.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:60058 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:37:44PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:18 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Not sure when this came up the last time. However we seem to be the > > last large distribution to use SLAB as the kernel allocator. > > Don't we want to change that some time? > Yes, let's change to SLUB. I think SLUB_DEBUG and > SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED should be enabled, except on armel/marvell. Okay. I'll do that. Bastian -- The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play. -- Kirk, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.8
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-18 18:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 18:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Frank Chung <chungf@gmail.com> - 2018-02-22 09:20 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-02-22 17:30 +0100
csiph-web