Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Bastian Blank Newsgroups: linux.debian.kernel Subject: Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 23 18:33:09 2018 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Mail-Followup-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/115574 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20180123181558.zshco4hsb23igkh6@shell.thinkmo.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 17 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:15:59 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20180123181558.zshco4hsb23igkh6@shell.thinkmo.de> X-Original-References: <20180118171808.6udpsrguey3lkaro@shell.thinkmo.de> <1516729064.5097.88.camel@decadent.org.uk> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:60058 Hi On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:37:44PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:18 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Not sure when this came up the last time. However we seem to be the > > last large distribution to use SLAB as the kernel allocator. > > Don't we want to change that some time? > Yes, let's change to SLUB. I think SLUB_DEBUG and > SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED should be enabled, except on armel/marvell. Okay. I'll do that. Bastian -- The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play. -- Kirk, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.8