Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60058

Re: SLAB vs. SLUB

From Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: SLAB vs. SLUB
Date 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
Message-ID <vbbEe-5Ms-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <v9mkp-8t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vbaIa-5dF-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:37:44PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:18 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Not sure when this came up the last time.  However we seem to be the
> > last large distribution to use SLAB as the kernel allocator.
> > Don't we want to change that some time?
> Yes, let's change to SLUB.  I think SLUB_DEBUG and
> SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED should be enabled, except on armel/marvell.

Okay.  I'll do that.

Bastian

-- 
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play.
		-- Kirk, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.8

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-18 18:40 +0100
  Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 18:40 +0100
    Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
      Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Frank Chung <chungf@gmail.com> - 2018-02-22 09:20 +0100
        Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-02-22 17:30 +0100

csiph-web