Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60059

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: armel/marvell kernel size
Date 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
Message-ID <vbbEf-5Ms-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uCG9P-4Kh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v99ZT-mH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vaKNH-5y0-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 22:38 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Ben,
> 
> Thanks for keeping armel things rolling for a few releases!
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 15:07 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Sadly, linux has again failed to build on armel in experimental due to
> > > the image size growing too large.
> > 
> > It's happened again.  The compressed image is 1% over the limit.
> 
> Yes, it's time again.
> 
> I tried the "CRYPTO_MANAGER2" stuff you mentioned before.
> Unfortunately, I didn't make it built as module, except after
> disabling CONFIG_NET, which seems quite ridiculous.
> 
> Do you know any other option, BTW?
> I'll continue trying for a while.

There's an upstream change in cfg80211 that enables direct-loading of
wireless rules, which requires public key crypto in the kernel.  There
doesn't appear to be any option to disable that mode, even though we
don't need it because crda still works.  Maybe you could disable
wireless networking completely?

Some options that could possibly be changed from y to m:

- I2C, I2C_CHARDEV, I2C_MV64XXX.  initramfs-tools should include I2C
drivers to the initramfs if needed, but I'm not certain.

- MTD, MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS, etc.  But I'm pretty sure this will break
some systems unless initramfs-tools is updated to include and load the
cmdlinepart module.

- RTC_DRV_MV (and disable RTC_HCTOSYS).  There's a udev rule that
should load the system clock from the first RTC if its driver is a
module.

- SPI_ORION.  initramfs-tools should include this in the initramfs if
needed, but I'm not certain.

Some options that could possibly be disabled:

- AUDIT.  This is quite a niche feature.

Also try comparing the complete configs over time and looking for
symbols newly set to y.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-20 16:10 +0200
  Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2017-10-23 17:40 +0200
    Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-26 23:10 +0200
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2017-10-29 18:20 +0100
  Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-18 05:30 +0100
    Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-01-22 15:00 +0100
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-26 19:00 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 13:50 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 14:20 +0100
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 19:20 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-23 00:10 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-24 03:00 +0100
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 07:50 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 14:40 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-28 11:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Federico Pietro Briata <federico@briata.org> - 2018-03-28 14:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 15:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-04-03 08:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 16:20 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 02:10 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 18:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-04-02 01:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:10 +0200
                Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel  size) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:30 +0200
                armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-27 21:40 +0200
                Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-28 06:40 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200

csiph-web