Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60056
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: SLAB vs. SLUB |
| Date | 2018-01-23 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vbaIa-5dF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v9mkp-8t-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:18 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Moin > > Not sure when this came up the last time. However we seem to be the > last large distribution to use SLAB as the kernel allocator. > > Don't we want to change that some time? Yes, let's change to SLUB. I think SLUB_DEBUG and SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED should be enabled, except on armel/marvell. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-18 18:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 18:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Frank Chung <chungf@gmail.com> - 2018-02-22 09:20 +0100
Re: SLAB vs. SLUB Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-02-22 17:30 +0100
csiph-web