Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83139

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <J247f-3hPw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-superh-request@lists.debian.org Sun Jul 21 13:17:00 2024
Old-Return-Path <ben@decadent.org.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.363 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BTKCKLgPtJtA8H1jVrP9"
User-Agent Evolution 3.52.3-1
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP 2a02:578:851f:1502:391e:c5f5:10e2:b9a3
X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From ben@decadent.org.uk
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned No (on maynard); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List <debian-superh@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/2726
List-ID <debian-superh.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/d8c9c72220538b284bdcad4a2aa5719156bda791.camel@decadent.org.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 51
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:16:36 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <d8c9c72220538b284bdcad4a2aa5719156bda791.camel@decadent.org.uk>
X-Original-References <531f976c5b275f85abaf98ab89ec3ed9be6aa6ff.camel@decadent.org.uk> <24debffba793d0ca9a3671d91c5d7e74a49beb2a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.ports.superh:450 linux.debian.kernel:83139

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
> > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian
> >   kernel package, and if so how?
> 
> I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love
> to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce
> the kernel image size at this point though.
> 
> I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel.

I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit:
<https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>.

Can you test that this produces a working kernel?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
One of the nice things about standards is that
there are so many of them.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web