Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #74353

Bug#990279: Status?

From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#990279: Status?
Date 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
Message-ID <DOGdH-tTL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOEvf-sEL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOEvf-sEL-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Timothy,

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:23:10PM -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> I can confirm Bullseye is still affected by this bug.
> 
> Is there any chance of this fix being applied to the Bullseye stable
> kernels?  We're having to maintain kernel builds in our own
> repositories to fix this regression, and that introduces some lag
> when e.g. security updates are pushed to Debian.

This needs someone to submit a (tested) backport patch to
stable maintainers, so it can be applied in the 5.10.y stable series.

Christian, would it be possible to do that? Cf.
https://bugs.debian.org/990279#42 and
https://bugs.debian.org/990279#52

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Wesley Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-06-24 15:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 07:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 23:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-08-10 03:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 16:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> - 2021-10-10 16:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-13 22:20 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 16:40 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 00:10 +0100
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 20:40 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 20:30 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
      Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-03-09 21:10 +0100

csiph-web