Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #72589

Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu

From Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu
Date 2021-08-10 03:30 +0200
Message-ID <CKoKB-6xp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


I just now noticed Timothy Pearson's note about reverting the
alignment check patch.  An excellent thread to start pulling on, but I
don't think that is the correct fix in itself.  If the addresses
involved are not 64K aligned but merely 4K aligned, then the IOMMU
will have to open an overly wide aperture to include the misaligned
first (and possibly last) pages.

This may suggest that a fix is needed in userspace to ensure proper
alignment, or the misaligned addresses may be coming from somewhere
else in the kernel itself.  I suspect adding some WARN_ON (or perhaps
WARN_ON_ONCE, just in case) will prove informative.  If time permits,
I'll do that, but please don't wait on me.

Cheers,
--nwf;

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Wesley Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-06-24 15:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 07:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 23:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-08-10 03:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 16:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> - 2021-10-10 16:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-13 22:20 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 16:40 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 00:10 +0100
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 20:40 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 20:30 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
      Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-03-09 21:10 +0100

csiph-web