Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1092493

Bug#990279: Status?

From	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Bug#990279: Status?
Date	2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
Message-ID	<DOGdH-tTL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOEvf-sEL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOEvf-sEL-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Timothy,

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:23:10PM -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> I can confirm Bullseye is still affected by this bug.
> 
> Is there any chance of this fix being applied to the Bullseye stable
> kernels?  We're having to maintain kernel builds in our own
> repositories to fix this regression, and that introduces some lag
> when e.g. security updates are pushed to Debian.

This needs someone to submit a (tested) backport patch to
stable maintainers, so it can be applied in the 5.10.y stable series.

Christian, would it be possible to do that? Cf.
https://bugs.debian.org/990279#42 and
https://bugs.debian.org/990279#52

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 20:40 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 20:30 +0100
      Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
        Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100

csiph-web