Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #74260

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

From Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?
Date 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
Message-ID <DKIH7-2Gm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

As of kernel 5.15.5 (bpo) I see that max_t() is still used. If this is 
blocking any merge into the stable kernel patch, I can test it with 
just PAGE_SIZE to confirm whether it is okay.

As it stands, I currently need to manually build the stable kernel in 
order to have a functioning Blackbird workstation.

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:16:27 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso 
<carnil@debian.org> wrote:
 > Source: linux
 > Source-Version: 5.13.9-1~exp1
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:02:58PM +0000, Nathaniel Filardo wrote:
 > > It looks like the missing patch made its way into
 > > 5.15.0-0.bpo.2-powerpc64le, as f4d3da72a76a9ce... I think.  As a
 > > result, I think this bug is overcome by events and can be closed.
 >
 > Indeed, thanks for reminding and referencing the upstream commit.
 >
 > Regards,
 > Salvatore
 >
 >



Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Wesley Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-06-24 15:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 07:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 23:20 +0200
  Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-08-10 03:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 16:00 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> - 2021-10-10 16:30 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-13 22:20 +0200
    Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 16:40 +0200
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 00:10 +0100
  Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 20:40 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 20:30 +0100
    Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
      Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
  Bug#990279: Status? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-03-09 21:10 +0100

csiph-web