Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #74260
| From | Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? |
| Date | 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DKIH7-2Gm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
As of kernel 5.15.5 (bpo) I see that max_t() is still used. If this is blocking any merge into the stable kernel patch, I can test it with just PAGE_SIZE to confirm whether it is okay. As it stands, I currently need to manually build the stable kernel in order to have a functioning Blackbird workstation. On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:16:27 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote: > Source: linux > Source-Version: 5.13.9-1~exp1 > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:02:58PM +0000, Nathaniel Filardo wrote: > > It looks like the missing patch made its way into > > 5.15.0-0.bpo.2-powerpc64le, as f4d3da72a76a9ce... I think. As a > > result, I think this bug is overcome by events and can be closed. > > Indeed, thanks for reminding and referencing the upstream commit. > > Regards, > Salvatore > >
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Wesley Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-06-24 15:20 +0200
Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 07:00 +0200
Bug#990279: Also affects stable... Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2021-07-25 23:20 +0200
Bug#990279: linux-image-5.10.0-7-powerpc64le: Upgrade to 5.10.0-7-powerpc64le from 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-powerpc64le breaks amdgpu Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-08-10 03:30 +0200
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2021-10-10 16:00 +0200
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> - 2021-10-10 16:30 +0200
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-13 22:20 +0200
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 16:40 +0200
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Nathaniel Filardo <nwfilardo@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 00:10 +0100
Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 20:40 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-08 22:30 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 20:30 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com> - 2022-02-09 21:30 +0100
Bug#990279: Status? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-03-09 21:10 +0100
csiph-web