Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1091194

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?

From Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines?
Date 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100
Message-ID <DKIH7-2Gm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Ctxhf-3p8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

As of kernel 5.15.5 (bpo) I see that max_t() is still used. If this is 
blocking any merge into the stable kernel patch, I can test it with 
just PAGE_SIZE to confirm whether it is okay.

As it stands, I currently need to manually build the stable kernel in 
order to have a functioning Blackbird workstation.

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:16:27 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso 
<carnil@debian.org> wrote:
 > Source: linux
 > Source-Version: 5.13.9-1~exp1
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:02:58PM +0000, Nathaniel Filardo wrote:
 > > It looks like the missing patch made its way into
 > > 5.15.0-0.bpo.2-powerpc64le, as f4d3da72a76a9ce... I think.  As a
 > > result, I think this bug is overcome by events and can be closed.
 >
 > Indeed, thanks for reminding and referencing the upstream commit.
 >
 > Regards,
 > Salvatore
 >
 >



Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#990279: 9a89a721b41b (" drm/amdgpu: check alignment on CPU page for bo map") breaks amdgpu on ppc64 machines? Andrew <akaminski@mailfence.com> - 2022-01-29 00:20 +0100

csiph-web