Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Yet more about my projects... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-16 15:29 -0800
 
[OT] Play tic-tac-toe using e-Letters or i-Letters! (14 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-02 19:08 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 12:31 +0800
     → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-11 16:06 +0000
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:11 +0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> 2016-12-11 11:35 -0500
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> 2016-12-11 09:32 -0700
         → Re: [OT] Games must have winner? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:10 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-11 17:26 +0000
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: computers vs humans "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:12 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> 2016-12-11 20:23 -0500
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:14 +0800
           → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-12 08:41 +0000
             → Tic-tac-toe as an 100% electronic game? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:44 +0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 10:02 -0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe? Sodoku? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 12:52 +0800
 
Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? (33 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 20:56 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-12-11 08:48 -0600
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:00 +0800
       → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 16:42 -0600
         → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:11 +0800
           → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:00 -0500
             → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:03 +0800
               → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:08 -0800
               → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:17 -0500
                 → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:30 +0800
                 → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:57 -0500
         → Re: The real and fair DIce of Solomon? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:13 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:05 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:46 +0800
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2016-12-12 01:44 +0100
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 02:02 +0100
     → Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:51 +0800
       → Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 20:17 +0100
   → Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:15 +0800
     → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Johan Nel <johan.nel@xsinet.co.za> 2016-12-12 16:46 +0200
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:49 +0800
         → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Adam Jensen <hanzer@riseup.net> 2016-12-12 10:35 -0500
           → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:56 -0800
     → Re: Fake randomness is still random? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) 2016-12-12 16:41 +0000
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 17:45 +0100
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2016-12-12 16:51 +0000
         → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:10 +0100
           → Re: Randomness and Taro "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
         → Re: From randomness to astrology "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2016-12-13 14:35 -0500
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> 2016-12-13 12:38 -0700
       → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2016-12-14 14:45 -0500
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:02 +0000
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> 2016-12-15 22:08 +0100
 
A comparatively efficient software for embedding secret information bits into nataural language texts Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2016-12-15 21:24 +0100
 
About the essence of richness... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-15 11:41 -0800
 
Here is my enhanced proof about the essence of richness... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-15 10:44 -0800
 
What is the essence of richness ? (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-15 05:58 -0800
   → Re: What is the essence of richness ? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 01:02 +0800
 
Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? (7 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:27 +0800
   → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-13 17:03 +0000
     → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 10:22 +0100
       → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-12-14 15:49 +0000
         → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 17:02 +0100
           → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-14 16:30 +0000
             → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-15 13:37 +0100
       → Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-12-14 16:01 +0000
 
Here is another arab like me Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 16:06 -0800
 
More about the essence of pure morality.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:51 -0800
 
Read it again... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:33 -0800
 
The essence of pure morality.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 15:29 -0800
 
Read again, i correct... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 14:08 -0800
 
The essence of law... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 13:53 -0800
 
C++ synchronization objects library Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:58 -0800
 
Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library version 1.53 Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:57 -0800
 
Read about my philosophy Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-14 09:51 -0800
 
Re: World Rubik Cube record: 4.73 seconds "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-14 18:24 +0800
 
Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-13 17:22 -0800
   → Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-14 01:54 +0000
     → Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2016-12-14 04:27 +0100
 
Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube (13 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-06 23:04 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 03:47 -0600
     → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 20:32 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 18:24 -0600
         → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-12-08 01:36 +0000
           → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:36 +0800
             → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-08 02:56 +0000
               → Re: [OT] Posting algorithm "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 12:31 +0800
           → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:37 +0800
     → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube marston shores <kp@of.fire> 2016-12-07 09:47 -0700
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-07 07:01 -0800
     → Re: [OT] A: Rubik Cube equation? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 10:45 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Re: Rubik Cube David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-08 10:58 +0100
     → Re: [OT] Re: Understanding mathematics through learning "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-08 21:30 +0800

← Newer ~Page 187 of ~300 (articles 7090–7174) Older →


csiph-web