Re: etiology of exceptions

From	"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: etiology of exceptions
Date	2012-10-08 22:52 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<k4vhum$8sd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<d4aa81c8-9fb6-4251-a065-e3573eccce62@googlegroups.com> <902b53ef-fa30-4470-914f-a5d3bf904b60@googlegroups.com> <k4vh2i$3qg$1@dont-email.me> <adgvsoFp4lcU3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

"Ian Collins" <ian-news@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:adgvsoFp4lcU3@mid.individual.net...
> On 10/09/12 10:37, LudovicoVan wrote:
>> <jussi.santti@ard.fi>  wrote in message
>> news:902b53ef-fa30-4470-914f-a5d3bf904b60@googlegroups.com...
>>> tiistai, 25. syyskuuta 2012 17.29.21 UTC+3 bob kirjoitti:
>>>> What is the etiology of exceptions? Did they come about because people
>>>> got tired of having to check a return value every time they called a
>>>> function?
>>>
>>> Not answering the etiology of exceptions question, sorry. But a related
>>> question: What is the best understanding of their role after 40+ years?
>>> Let me try:
>>>
>>> -exceptions for programmer errors only
>>> -exceptions should be reserved for complete failures
>>> -exception are no program flow cotrol structures
>>> -exception do not add to program correctness, but to robustness 
>>> (operation
>>> out of specifications)
>>
>> Not so.
>
> Now there's a well presented argument.....

Where is it? :)  Out of metaphor (so to say), if you try and negate the 
above assertions, you'll get, I think, pretty much acceptable ones.  It 
seemed so much done on purpose that I fear I am spoiling something...

-LV

Thread

etiology of exceptions bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-25 07:29 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 09:15 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-09-25 18:50 +0200
    Re: etiology of exceptions Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-09-25 20:51 +0000
      Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 15:32 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-25 23:43 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-09-28 08:07 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 09:47 +0100
  Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-07 23:13 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:37 +0100
      Re: etiology of exceptions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:46 +1300
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:52 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-10 08:06 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-10 18:24 +0100
        Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 05:35 -0700
          Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-11 14:40 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:20 -0700
            Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:28 -0700
              Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:13 +0100
          Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-11 15:35 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:21 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:10 -0700
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:16 +0100

csiph-web