Re: etiology of exceptions

From	"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: etiology of exceptions
Date	2012-10-15 22:13 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<k5huaa$iq7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <02c3ed18-a81a-4ae0-b03d-666bc239d862@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <k54b09$v0v$1@dont-email.me> <0eed1afd-7a29-4b46-b990-0ee9d988c76d@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <k56i7p$4fq$1@dont-email.me> <72efd5d6-d0d0-4412-882d-c5e33cea45dd@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

<jussi.santti@ard.fi> wrote in message 
news:72efd5d6-d0d0-4412-882d-c5e33cea45dd@googlegroups.com...
> torstai, 11. lokakuuta 2012 16.40.10 UTC+3 Julio P. Di Egidio kirjoitti:
>> "Nick Keighley" <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
<snip>

>> > the difficulty is that exception specifications are broken in C++
>>
>> You are using "specification" in a very specific technical sense, but I 
>> was
>> referring to the formal documentation that must go with any product,
>> regardless of implementation details.  And the overall point was that an
>> exception is, *by definition*, something we *do* forecast.
>>
> When we talk about C++ and other common languages, the specifications are 
> in the form of function prototypes.

Thanks for explaining what was already understood.  OTOH, what you talk 
about remains quite irrelevant to the OP.

-LV

Thread

etiology of exceptions bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-25 07:29 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 09:15 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-09-25 18:50 +0200
    Re: etiology of exceptions Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-09-25 20:51 +0000
      Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 15:32 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-25 23:43 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-09-28 08:07 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 09:47 +0100
  Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-07 23:13 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:37 +0100
      Re: etiology of exceptions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:46 +1300
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:52 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-10 08:06 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-10 18:24 +0100
        Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 05:35 -0700
          Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-11 14:40 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:20 -0700
            Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:28 -0700
              Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:13 +0100
          Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-11 15:35 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:21 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:10 -0700
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:16 +0100

csiph-web