Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #2321

Re: etiology of exceptions

From "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: etiology of exceptions
Date 2012-10-11 14:40 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k56i7p$4fq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <d4aa81c8-9fb6-4251-a065-e3573eccce62@googlegroups.com> <902b53ef-fa30-4470-914f-a5d3bf904b60@googlegroups.com> <02c3ed18-a81a-4ae0-b03d-666bc239d862@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <k54b09$v0v$1@dont-email.me> <0eed1afd-7a29-4b46-b990-0ee9d988c76d@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Nick Keighley" <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:0eed1afd-7a29-4b46-b990-0ee9d988c76d@ib4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 10, 6:24 pm, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:
<snip>

>> If it is not in the spec, it is not an exception in the technical sense.
>> This might be clearer if we think, for instance, of the case of accessing 
>> an
>> external API.
>
> the difficulty is that exception specifications are broken in C++

You are using "specification" in a very specific technical sense, but I was 
referring to the formal documentation that must go with any product, 
regardless of implementation details.  And the overall point was that an 
exception is, *by definition*, something we *do* forecast.

-LV
 

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

etiology of exceptions bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-25 07:29 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 09:15 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-09-25 18:50 +0200
    Re: etiology of exceptions Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-09-25 20:51 +0000
      Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 15:32 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-25 23:43 -0700
  Re: etiology of exceptions "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-09-28 08:07 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 09:47 +0100
  Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-07 23:13 -0700
    Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:37 +0100
      Re: etiology of exceptions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:46 +1300
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:52 +0100
    Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-10 08:06 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-10 18:24 +0100
        Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 05:35 -0700
          Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-11 14:40 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:20 -0700
            Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:28 -0700
              Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:13 +0100
          Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-11 15:35 +0100
            Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:21 -0700
      Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:10 -0700
        Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:16 +0100

csiph-web