Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2307
| From | "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: etiology of exceptions |
| Date | 2012-10-10 18:24 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k54b09$v0v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <d4aa81c8-9fb6-4251-a065-e3573eccce62@googlegroups.com> <902b53ef-fa30-4470-914f-a5d3bf904b60@googlegroups.com> <02c3ed18-a81a-4ae0-b03d-666bc239d862@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> |
"Nick Keighley" <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:02c3ed18-a81a-4ae0-b03d-666bc239d862@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 8, 7:13 am, jussi.san...@ard.fi wrote: >> tiistai, 25. syyskuuta 2012 17.29.21 UTC+3 bob kirjoitti: <snip> >> -exception are no program flow cotrol structures > > probably But they do alter/contribute to the program flow (I mean, even when used properly). To the point that we do model that flow, say, in a unit functional diagram. >> -exception do not add to program correctness, but to robustness >> (operation out of specifications) > > the exceptions a function may throw could be thought of as part of its > specification (though C++ has problems with this) If it is not in the spec, it is not an exception in the technical sense. This might be clearer if we think, for instance, of the case of accessing an external API. -LV
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
etiology of exceptions bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-25 07:29 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 09:15 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-09-25 18:50 +0200
Re: etiology of exceptions Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-09-25 20:51 +0000
Re: etiology of exceptions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-25 15:32 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-09-25 23:43 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-09-28 08:07 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 09:47 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-07 23:13 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:37 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:46 +1300
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-08 22:52 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-10 08:06 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-10 18:24 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 05:35 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-11 14:40 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:20 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:28 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:13 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-11 15:35 +0100
Re: etiology of exceptions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-11 08:21 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions jussi.santti@ard.fi - 2012-10-15 08:10 -0700
Re: etiology of exceptions "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2012-10-15 22:16 +0100
csiph-web