Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90165 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-19 21:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-08-29 18:15 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 590 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
/dev/tcp Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-19 21:20 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 23:53 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-19 23:42 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-20 00:59 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-20 03:59 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-20 10:10 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-20 18:15 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-20 23:30 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 01:18 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-21 09:52 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-21 08:12 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-21 11:16 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-21 22:57 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-22 06:17 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net> - 2026-08-30 17:56 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-21 21:50 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-08-24 17:42 +0300
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-24 23:53 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 02:27 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 00:56 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-23 04:01 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-23 03:37 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-23 13:50 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 22:28 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-24 09:35 +0200
Overwriting with random data (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:10 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-24 20:34 +0200
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 20:57 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-24 22:26 +0200
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 02:39 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 08:45 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 21:39 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-26 18:08 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:49 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 00:59 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:19 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:36 +0200
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 15:19 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 03:33 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 09:18 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 17:34 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 01:52 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:11 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 01:00 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:16 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 08:32 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 03:34 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-28 11:37 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:44 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-28 13:25 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 15:27 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 00:59 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 01:57 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:42 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 19:50 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:11 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-29 05:25 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 02:12 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:15 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 21:56 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:29 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-28 13:43 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 20:15 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-08-28 21:59 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 02:09 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-29 08:59 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 09:25 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-29 11:19 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:45 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:38 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-09-02 19:33 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-02 20:21 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 22:22 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 23:28 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:51 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 23:09 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:52 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-08-29 15:10 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-08-30 08:58 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-30 23:45 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-29 21:47 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 13:56 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-29 14:17 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-08-29 16:02 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:12 +0200
Re: Overwriting with random data Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-08-29 21:04 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-05 09:32 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-05 13:49 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2026-09-20 15:54 +0200
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:58 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:23 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:53 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:12 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 00:09 -0400
Re: Overwriting with random data The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:52 +0100
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Overwriting with random data Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:48 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 00:37 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-24 00:31 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-24 09:45 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 12:52 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 12:50 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-20 13:50 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-20 13:02 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-20 18:26 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-29 13:48 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:44 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-29 23:05 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-30 00:58 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-30 04:12 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-30 09:25 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 11:00 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-30 23:54 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 09:34 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-05 09:08 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-05 10:25 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-05 19:19 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-05 22:38 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-05 21:40 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-06 09:16 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-05 21:38 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-06 09:19 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-06 18:54 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-06 23:27 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-07 11:54 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-07 03:52 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-07 00:12 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-07 12:00 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-07 19:34 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-07 22:23 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 05:45 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-07 22:24 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 05:48 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-08 01:52 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-08 08:46 +0100
[OT] /dev/economy (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 10:28 +0100
Re: [OT] /dev/economy The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 13:43 +0100
Re: [OT] /dev/economy (was: Re: /dev/tcp) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 18:32 +0000
Re: [OT] /dev/economy (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-09-08 20:38 +0000
Re: [OT] /dev/economy Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 00:48 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 18:41 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 00:52 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-09 01:34 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 09:28 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 09:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-09 18:22 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 23:37 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-10 04:46 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-10 02:19 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-10 18:25 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-11 03:09 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 10:20 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 19:25 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:36 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 23:05 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-13 07:14 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 03:49 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-13 21:51 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 20:59 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 04:33 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-14 01:26 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 10:49 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 17:46 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 19:07 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 00:33 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:50 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:56 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-11 23:31 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:43 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-12 14:05 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 17:40 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-12 19:29 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 19:21 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 02:37 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 11:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-10 18:38 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 00:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 04:10 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 01:00 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 00:55 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 09:32 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 18:44 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 21:05 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-09 01:35 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 03:47 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-09 18:18 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 23:22 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-10 04:44 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-10 02:13 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 11:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-10 19:07 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-10 18:35 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-11 03:24 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 10:27 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 19:07 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 02:36 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:52 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:23 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-12 19:22 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 19:37 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-10 20:58 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 00:25 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-11 11:32 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 10:51 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-11 12:03 +0200
[OT] Middle East (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 00:43 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 02:09 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 11:45 +0100
[OT] Middle East (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:56 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:37 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-13 19:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 21:01 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldij@alien.free> - 2026-09-13 17:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Middle East c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 22:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Middle East rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 03:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Middle East c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 23:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 10:52 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 02:37 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:47 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-12 14:09 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 17:41 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-12 14:07 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 17:45 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:13 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-12 19:05 +0000
[OT] Middle East (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:01 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:40 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-13 14:08 +0200
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 21:01 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 20:48 -0400
Re: [OT] Middle East Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 10:45 +0100
Re: [OT] Middle East The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 10:59 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 04:12 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 10:16 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-11 19:13 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:27 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-12 19:42 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 00:22 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-13 07:51 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-13 07:02 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-13 09:45 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:21 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 03:02 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-13 08:39 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 03:50 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 10:13 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:51 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:44 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-13 21:39 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-13 19:32 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 10:54 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-14 09:20 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 11:06 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-14 19:56 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 20:07 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-14 23:01 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 00:30 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:42 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-15 09:26 +0200
[OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 10:18 +0100
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-15 20:24 +0200
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:51 +0100
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 00:56 +0000
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 07:25 +0200
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:13 +0100
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:09 +0100
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 00:52 +0000
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 07:26 +0200
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:09 +0100
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] "Democracy" Exports of the United States The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:24 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 16:34 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 18:27 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 18:21 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-15 20:32 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 02:17 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 18:30 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 21:35 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:59 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-16 08:20 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:33 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 18:16 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 17:50 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 19:55 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 01:10 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 02:30 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-16 23:19 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 12:44 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-17 20:19 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-17 23:27 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 02:54 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-18 01:14 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:29 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-18 08:29 -0600
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:27 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 20:07 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-19 11:24 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-19 10:53 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-19 13:35 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-19 19:29 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:29 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-19 22:01 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-19 23:41 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:34 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-20 14:07 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-20 17:40 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-20 21:03 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 13:21 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 13:18 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-21 13:16 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:13 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 03:38 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 06:49 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-21 19:14 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-21 23:13 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 04:22 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-22 06:55 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-22 03:51 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-21 13:13 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-20 10:22 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-17 08:05 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 12:46 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:31 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 12:16 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:48 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 12:11 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:52 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 22:16 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:12 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-17 07:16 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 06:37 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 13:43 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 13:32 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-17 21:51 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 22:15 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 18:22 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:25 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 22:06 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 03:23 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-18 01:24 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 00:58 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:55 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:28 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-17 22:19 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-17 21:58 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 22:25 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 00:57 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 03:02 +0000
[OT] Washington Treaty of 1949 (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 10:59 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 02:58 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 10:02 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 18:18 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-15 18:49 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-15 21:21 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:53 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 02:34 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-16 04:31 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 06:36 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-16 08:30 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 02:29 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 17:43 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 19:05 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-14 19:50 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-14 20:00 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2026-09-14 23:05 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 00:18 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-15 01:52 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:48 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 17:30 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:43 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-16 00:37 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 06:33 +0000
[OT] /dev/middle-east (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:37 +0100
Re: [OT] /dev/middle-east The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:45 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:26 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 18:38 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:33 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:54 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 13:58 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-17 23:25 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-15 18:49 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:57 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:45 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-14 21:03 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:58 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-14 23:56 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 02:00 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-15 02:14 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-14 20:59 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 07:56 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-15 17:48 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:43 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 01:56 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-15 21:28 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:04 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-15 23:32 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:58 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 01:33 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:23 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 09:01 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:29 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 01:20 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 09:03 +0200
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:21 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-16 18:43 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:38 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-17 17:44 +0000
[OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:31 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 20:35 +0200
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 02:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-17 08:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 10:21 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:53 +0200
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:31 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 21:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 02:48 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:42 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 19:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:18 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 21:57 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 02:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 19:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:30 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 11:47 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 13:52 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-17 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 21:54 +0100
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-18 02:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Are Ceuta and Melilla actually part of the Schengen Area? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-18 08:37 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-13 09:03 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-11 23:07 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:40 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-12 23:06 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 09:29 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-09 18:20 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 23:26 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 11:29 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-11 00:58 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-11 10:19 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 11:27 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-09 04:25 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 00:43 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-09 09:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-09 23:12 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-10 11:32 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 09:31 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-07 22:20 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-08 05:05 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-08 01:51 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-08 09:34 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-07 11:59 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-07 19:18 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-05 21:35 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 13:06 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:54 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-21 22:57 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-22 21:47 +0200
The hammer is best (Was: /dev/tcp) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-22 23:50 +0000
Re: The hammer is best (Was: /dev/tcp) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-23 04:28 -0400
Re: The hammer is best Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 10:14 +0100
Re: The hammer is best "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 13:16 +0100
Re: The hammer is best Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-23 21:20 +0200
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-24 02:18 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:26 +0100
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 02:06 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:18 +0100
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 00:51 -0400
Re: The hammer is best Joed Oakes <lost@noway.home.invalid> - 2026-08-23 19:42 -0400
Re: The hammer is best Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-23 23:56 +0000
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-24 02:25 -0400
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 01:14 +0000
Re: The hammer is best "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-24 09:50 +0200
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 00:56 -0400
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-24 00:53 -0400
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 06:42 +0000
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-24 23:34 -0400
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 04:08 +0000
Re: The hammer is best "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:29 +0200
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:52 +0000
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:19 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 09:29 +0100
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 17:03 +0000
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 21:31 +0100
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 22:18 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:28 +0100
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 02:07 -0400
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 06:39 +0000
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:23 +0100
Re: The hammer is best Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-25 18:26 +0000
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:05 +0100
Re: The hammer is best "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 21:43 +0200
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:35 +0100
Re: The hammer is best Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:21 +0000
Re: The hammer is best "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 23:14 +0200
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 19:08 +0000
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:38 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 10:22 +0100
Re: The hammer is best rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 17:26 +0000
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 00:00 -0400
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:44 -0400
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 01:49 -0400
Re: The hammer is best The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:20 +0100
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 01:23 -0400
Re: The hammer is best c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-23 22:16 -0400
Re: /dev/tcp Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:41 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-21 22:58 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-21 22:28 -0400
ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-08-24 13:56 +0100
Bash vs. ksh - Does it matter? And the 'vi' mode thing... (Was: ksh (was: /dev/tcp)) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-24 14:57 +0000
Re: Bash vs. ksh - Does it matter? And the 'vi' mode thing... (Was: ksh Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-30 13:26 +0100
Re: Bash vs. ksh - Does it matter? And the 'vi' mode thing... (Was: ksh Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-30 23:49 +0000
Re: Bash vs. ksh - Does it matter? And the 'vi' mode thing... (Was: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 01:35 -0400
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-24 21:08 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-24 21:28 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-29 13:29 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:41 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:43 +0100
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 01:11 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-08-25 13:25 +0100
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2026-08-26 13:34 +0100
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-27 02:23 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:40 -0400
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 01:40 -0400
Re: ksh (was: /dev/tcp) Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-29 13:40 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 02:25 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 06:52 +0000
Re: ksh The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:27 +0100
Re: ksh Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-25 18:26 +0000
Re: ksh Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-25 22:03 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:04 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 18:00 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:17 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 15:22 +0000
Re: ksh The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 17:55 +0100
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 23:14 -0400
Re: ksh The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:48 +0100
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:43 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 04:17 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 03:18 -0400
Re: ksh Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 15:54 +0000
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 20:40 +0000
Re: ksh The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:14 +0100
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 21:12 +0000
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 02:35 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 18:17 +0000
Re: ksh Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-08-25 09:56 +0200
Re: ksh "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:24 +0200
Re: ksh Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-25 20:36 +0200
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 04:23 +0000
Re: ksh "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-26 10:04 +0200
Re: ksh Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 10:03 +0100
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 21:50 -0400
Re: ksh Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-29 13:38 +0000
Re: ksh Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:42 +0000
Re: ksh "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 14:26 +0200
Re: ksh The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:27 +0100
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 02:43 -0400
Re: ksh Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-25 22:01 +0000
Re: ksh "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-26 01:32 +0200
Re: ksh c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 21:46 -0400
Re: ksh rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-26 04:25 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2026-08-20 18:22 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:57 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-23 06:37 -0700
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 14:49 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-23 16:13 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 19:08 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net> - 2026-08-29 00:52 +0100
Re: /dev/tcp Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-29 04:14 +0000
Re: /dev/tcp David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net> - 2026-08-29 19:06 +0100
[OT] Weather Underground (was: Re: /dev/tcp) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 08:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Weather Underground David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net> - 2026-08-29 18:15 +0100
Page 24 of 30 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 30 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-08 09:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <117oh5f$jrq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91167 |
On 07/09/2026 22:24, Pancho wrote:
> Externally it appears there is little difference between Republican and
> Democrat. Money controls important policy. The main party differences
> are social issues. They let the little people argue about woke,
> abortion, immigration, but the important economic stuff is locked down,
> the same for both parties.
>
> Is that fair, or are their real differences?
Pretty fair.
--
“Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"
- John K Galbraith
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-07 22:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ztGcnfAgCLBk7QL3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91159 |
On 9/7/26 07:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 07/09/2026 05:12, c186282 wrote: >> On 9/6/26 23:52, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> On 2026-09-06, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/09/2026 02:38, c186282 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/5/26 14:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 05/09/2026 10:25, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> People believe in all sorts of things, doesn’t make them true. >>>>>> >>>>>> It does in the New Left Mind, sadly >>>>> >>>>> And you SHALL believe what they say - or off to >>>>> the re-education camp, if you're that lucky. >>>> >>>> Both sides will shoot you for speaking out. >>>> Recently that seems to be more the Left than the Right. Anne >>>> Widdecombe. >>>> Charlie Kirk. >>>> >>>> Long time since Andreas Breivik... >>> >>> On the other hand, consider the Minneapolis killings. >> >> Which ONES ??? >> >> 'Blue' states are kinda anarchy. >> >> Of course, once the anarchy has done its >> damage, the commies will step in hard to >> "save" everyone ...... >> > According to the Youtube video I watched there aren't really any 'red > states' left. Yes, a lot. > Trumps approval rating is at an all time low Reading lefty 'news' I see :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-08 05:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng9jdbFkdeqU20@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91170 |
On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 22:20:19 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> Trumps approval rating is at an all time low > > > Reading lefty 'news' I see https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/warning-signs-abound-trumps- republicans-midterm-campaign-begins-final-sprint-2026-09-07/ Reuters is dead center. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/rumblings-fox-news-fired-maria- bartiromo-after-they/ There are many rumors about why she was canned including that Faux News is distancing itself from Trump. Opening the door for cheap beef imports from Argentina didn't do much for him in this state. The Reps up for election are bobbing and weaving. Expensive gas and diesel doesn't help either. Well, expensive everything. Inflation is out of control and he wants the Fed to lower the rates?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-08 01:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0qCcnSAVfYmgPwL3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91175 |
On 9/8/26 01:05, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 22:20:19 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >>> Trumps approval rating is at an all time low >> >> >> Reading lefty 'news' I see > > https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/warning-signs-abound-trumps- > republicans-midterm-campaign-begins-final-sprint-2026-09-07/ > > Reuters is dead center. Um ... not even close anymore. > https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/rumblings-fox-news-fired-maria- > bartiromo-after-they/ > > There are many rumors about why she was canned including that Faux News is > distancing itself from Trump. > > Opening the door for cheap beef imports from Argentina didn't do much for > him in this state. The Reps up for election are bobbing and weaving. > Expensive gas and diesel doesn't help either. Well, expensive everything. > Inflation is out of control and he wants the Fed to lower the rates?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-08 09:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <117ohb1$jrq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91170 |
On 08/09/2026 03:20, c186282 wrote:
> On 9/7/26 07:00, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 07/09/2026 05:12, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 9/6/26 23:52, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>>> On 2026-09-06, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/09/2026 02:38, c186282 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/5/26 14:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/09/2026 10:25, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People believe in all sorts of things, doesn’t make them true.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It does in the New Left Mind, sadly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you SHALL believe what they say - or off to
>>>>>> the re-education camp, if you're that lucky.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both sides will shoot you for speaking out.
>>>>> Recently that seems to be more the Left than the Right. Anne
>>>>> Widdecombe.
>>>>> Charlie Kirk.
>>>>>
>>>>> Long time since Andreas Breivik...
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, consider the Minneapolis killings.
>>>
>>> Which ONES ???
>>>
>>> 'Blue' states are kinda anarchy.
>>>
>>> Of course, once the anarchy has done its
>>> damage, the commies will step in hard to
>>> "save" everyone ......
>>>
>> According to the Youtube video I watched there aren't really any 'red
>> states' left.
>
> Yes, a lot.
>
>> Trumps approval rating is at an all time low
>
>
> Reading lefty 'news' I see :-)
>
Not really. I am if anything fairly right wing.
But Trump is not a conservative.
--
“Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"
- John K Galbraith
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-07 11:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <117m5dr$35vc1$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91150 |
On 07/09/2026 04:52, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-09-06, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 06/09/2026 02:38, c186282 wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/5/26 14:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/09/2026 10:25, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> People believe in all sorts of things, doesn’t make them true.
>>>>
>>>> It does in the New Left Mind, sadly
>>>
>>> And you SHALL believe what they say - or off to
>>> the re-education camp, if you're that lucky.
>>
>> Both sides will shoot you for speaking out.
>> Recently that seems to be more the Left than the Right. Anne Widdecombe.
>> Charlie Kirk.
>>
>> Long time since Andreas Breivik...
>
> On the other hand, consider the Minneapolis killings.
>
That wasn't really targeted political assassination by individuals or
anti-government agencies so much as a bunch of dumb thugs employed by
the government cocking things up beyond belief.
--
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”
― Leo Tolstoy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-07 19:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng8gvvFkdeqU14@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91158 |
On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:59:07 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > That wasn't really targeted political assassination by individuals or > anti-government agencies so much as a bunch of dumb thugs employed by > the government cocking things up beyond belief. The thugs and the screeching lesbians that drove for hours to get one killed deserved each other.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-05 21:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <i52cnZ0STbHuXgH3nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91120 |
On 9/5/26 05:08, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 31-08-2026, Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> a écrit : >> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes: >>> >>> I find it easier to put an option to be sure dd doesn't finish before >>> everything is written on the USB stick than launching other commands >>> after that. >> >> status=progress is not that option. > > Before using that option, I used no option, and when dd finished I had > to "grep Dirty /proc/meminfo" to try to guess when I was able to remove > my usb stick. Then one day I saw someone using that option. And now, I'm > using it myself, so dd takes more time to finish and I never had any > issue removing my usb stick once it finished. > > Maybe I'm the luckiest guy on earth, or there is a side effect which > makes it work, one day it won't work as expected. But right now, having > created dozens of usb sticks with that option, it never failed me. 'dd' is perfectly good - but you DO have to be careful. There's a reason it earned the nickname "Disk Destroyer" :-) "status=progress" is the best way to get a good bead on when it's REALLY done. Alas the bigger the buffer/block the easier it is to THINK it's done before it's really done. S=P is a big help - but I always gave it an extra minute or two even when progress SAID it was done. No probs. The biggest prob with 'dd' to copy disks is in that it wants to copy an ENTIRE one, even if it's 95% blank space. Utils that can do 'sparse' easily are MUCH better. >>> I didn't say there was only one way to do it. I said that putting the >>> option status=progress makes sure that the dd command doesn't >>> terminate before everything is written on the USB stick, so I know I >>> can remove it. >> >> status=progress does not guarantee that data is on the USB stick before >> dd terminates. I have no idea why you would think it does. > > Because it works. That helps believing in it. Before adding that option, > dd finished well faster, with that option, it takes more time to finish > and I never had any issue with usb sticks created in that way. So, that > helps believing there is a relation between the option and the expected > result. A "little slower", but SURE, is always better. >> dd only turns >> on synchronization options, or adds synchronization syscalls, if you >> explicitly tell it to do so, and status=progress is not one of the >> options that does that. > > Maybe, but it's a really good imitation. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 13:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wwvecffyfqo.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| In reply to | #90873 |
vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> writes: > Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> wrote: >> Unless the dd command was run without an option to do synchronous >> I/O and the tail end of the data is still being flushed from the >> queue. IIUC, doing a 'sync' afterward _should_ theoretically >> catch that case, too. > > From inspecting the man pages for sync(1) (and sync(2)), it appears > that running "sync" will only write out filesystem data. AFAICS Linux’s sync(2) flushes block devices as well (it calls sync_bdevs a couple of times). I can’t speak for other platforms. -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 13:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1169hp9$9sqa$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90219 |
On 20/08/2026 18:02, c186282 wrote: > Other odd Linux tricks - how many know you can > read/write to a disk drive that has no file > system ? Of course. Done all the time with floppies Just write to the raw device. After all, at some level some part of Linux has to do that anyway even if it is writing to a file. -- "An intellectual is a person knowledgeable in one field who speaks out only in others...” Tom Wolfe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 22:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <36ucnepaq_p9khT3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90281 |
On 8/21/26 08:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 20/08/2026 18:02, c186282 wrote: >> Other odd Linux tricks - how many know you can >> read/write to a disk drive that has no file >> system ? > Of course. Done all the time with floppies > > Just write to the raw device. > > After all, at some level some part of Linux has to do that anyway even > if it is writing to a file. It used to be popular for holding the max amount of binary data - no space wasted with the file system setup. A few years back I leveraged it for a disk-wipe program. Problem was that disks have become SO huge ... had to use M$ 128/256-bit var classes to access the whole thing. E-Disks ... can't REALLY wipe 'em alas. There are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton way - HAMMER :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-22 21:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fvaplmx3co.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #90314 |
On 2026-08-22 04:57, c186282 wrote: > On 8/21/26 08:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 20/08/2026 18:02, c186282 wrote: >>> Other odd Linux tricks - how many know you can >>> read/write to a disk drive that has no file >>> system ? >> Of course. Done all the time with floppies >> >> Just write to the raw device. >> >> After all, at some level some part of Linux has to do that anyway even >> if it is writing to a file. > > It used to be popular for holding the max amount > of binary data - no space wasted with the file > system setup. > > A few years back I leveraged it for a disk-wipe > program. Problem was that disks have become SO > huge ... had to use M$ 128/256-bit var classes to > access the whole thing. > > E-Disks ... can't REALLY wipe 'em alas. There > are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme > gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton > way - HAMMER :-) Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-22 23:50 +0000 |
| Subject | The hammer is best (Was: /dev/tcp) |
| Message-ID | <116dcl1$3hva0$1@news.xmission.com> |
| In reply to | #90353 |
In article <fvaplmx3co.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: ... >> are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme >> gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton >> way - HAMMER :-) > >Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. Hammer is better, because encryption can be worked around by holding a gun to the head of the person who knows the encryption key. But a hammer is forever. -- Trump has normalized hate. The media has normalized Trump.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 04:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best (Was: /dev/tcp) |
| Message-ID | <j72cnbBzwudjMxf3nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90363 |
On 8/22/26 19:50, Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <fvaplmx3co.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>, > Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > ... >>> are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme >>> gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton >>> way - HAMMER :-) >> >> Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. > > Hammer is better, because encryption can be worked around by holding a gun > to the head of the person who knows the encryption key. Usually they'll write it on a Post-It and stick it to their monitor :-) Also, encryption is only really great if someone physically STEALS yer disk - pretty rare. If yer system is up and the drives unlocked then they can spy and steal from those far more easily. > But a hammer is forever. Yep ! When I retired I had like 25 old mag drives - a VERY heavy box full. First ran a wipe app I'd writ on them. Then ... Took 'em to The Shop, drill press ... put a half-inch hole through the top and platters. More than Good Enough. DID hate wasting all those neo magnets though ... and HAD removed them from many drives. But, it was bail-out time, so Rude & Crude ........ A "cold chisel" and a big hammer works too. Still have a few 'mobiles' of HDD platters :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 10:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <wwvmrudkxkf.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| In reply to | #90363 |
gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes: > Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > ... >>> are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme >>> gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton >>> way - HAMMER :-) >> >> Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. > > Hammer is better, because encryption can be worked around by holding a > gun to the head of the person who knows the encryption key. My backup drives are encrypted. In principle they could be stolen from here, from an offsite location or in transit and if that happens I won’t have the opportunity to destroy it. The chances that someone would threaten my life or liberty over it are negligible, but if they did, they wouldn’t need to wait for a device to be disposed of, they’d just turn up at my door with a weapon, RIPA notice or other leverage. Physical destruction is not really relevant for most of the lifetime of confidential data, and encryption does actually achieve something useful in realistic use cases. High value data is protected by keys that no human knows. -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 13:55 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <gm3rlmxqg4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #90379 |
On 2026-08-23 11:14, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes: >> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >> ... >>>> are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme >>>> gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton >>>> way - HAMMER :-) >>> >>> Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. >> >> Hammer is better, because encryption can be worked around by holding a >> gun to the head of the person who knows the encryption key. > > My backup drives are encrypted. In principle they could be stolen from > here, from an offsite location or in transit and if that happens I won’t > have the opportunity to destroy it. Exactly. And in the typical business case, hammering of disks is not often done. Hard disks are simply repurposed, recycled, sold... usually zeroing them first. Encryption protects the case when zeroing is forgotten, or the disk breaks before that. Encryption protects against such accidents. > > The chances that someone would threaten my life or liberty over it are > negligible, but if they did, they wouldn’t need to wait for a device to > be disposed of, they’d just turn up at my door with a weapon, RIPA > notice or other leverage. > > Physical destruction is not really relevant for most of the lifetime of > confidential data, and encryption does actually achieve something useful > in realistic use cases. > > High value data is protected by keys that no human knows. > -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 13:16 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <116eoal$1sako$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90389 |
On 23/08/2026 12:55, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-08-23 11:14, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >> gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes: >>> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>> ... >>>>> are hidden buffers plus the wear-leveling scheme >>>>> gets in the way. You wipe 'em the Hillary Clinton >>>>> way - HAMMER :-) >>>> >>>> Instead, use encryption, on the device or the partitions. >>> >>> Hammer is better, because encryption can be worked around by holding a >>> gun to the head of the person who knows the encryption key. >> >> My backup drives are encrypted. In principle they could be stolen from >> here, from an offsite location or in transit and if that happens I won’t >> have the opportunity to destroy it. > > Exactly. > > And in the typical business case, hammering of disks is not often done. It is UNIVERSALLY done in the UK. Insurance will be voided, contracts lost and people will get fired if it is not. The big sources of usable hardware are BIG corporates - banks, insurance companies, travel agencies... they dump a thousand machines a year to recycling companies who sign in blood that the disk will be CRUSHED. > Hard disks are simply repurposed, recycled, sold... usually zeroing them > first. Encryption protects the case when zeroing is forgotten, or the > disk breaks before that. Encryption protects against such accidents. > No, they are not. Not by corporations. Some Mickey Mouse companies with nothing worth stealing might... -- The higher up the mountainside The greener grows the grass. The higher up the monkey climbs The more he shows his arse. Traditional
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-23 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <116fh62$kokl$1@news1.tnib.de> |
| In reply to | #90392 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On 23/08/2026 12:55, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> Hard disks are simply repurposed, recycled, sold... usually zeroing them >> first. Encryption protects the case when zeroing is forgotten, or the >> disk breaks before that. Encryption protects against such accidents. >> >No, they are not. Not by corporations. Some Mickey Mouse companies with >nothing worth stealing might... Corporations still act on the customs of the 2000 years because using their brains costs money that doesn't land in budgets where the money to destroy disks is already booked. Greetings Marc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-24 02:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <l9icnfXKBY35fxb3nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90410 |
On 8/23/26 15:20, Marc Haber wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 23/08/2026 12:55, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> Hard disks are simply repurposed, recycled, sold... usually zeroing them >>> first. Encryption protects the case when zeroing is forgotten, or the >>> disk breaks before that. Encryption protects against such accidents. >>> >> No, they are not. Not by corporations. Some Mickey Mouse companies with >> nothing worth stealing might... > > Corporations still act on the customs of the 2000 years because using > their brains costs money that doesn't land in budgets where the money > to destroy disks is already booked. Ummmm ??? Anyway, unless yer the CIA, ONE good whack with a ball-peen WILL ruin those HDDs. Quick and cheap. "Bang Bang Hillry's silver hammer cam down upon those phones" :-) SSDs ? Maybe TWO whacks. A "stun gun" applied to the pins will surely do it too. Sparky Sparky, no more chips.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-24 11:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: The hammer is best |
| Message-ID | <116h683$2o5cd$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90410 |
On 23/08/2026 20:20, Marc Haber wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 23/08/2026 12:55, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> Hard disks are simply repurposed, recycled, sold... usually zeroing them >>> first. Encryption protects the case when zeroing is forgotten, or the >>> disk breaks before that. Encryption protects against such accidents. >>> >> No, they are not. Not by corporations. Some Mickey Mouse companies with >> nothing worth stealing might... > > Corporations still act on the customs of the 2000 years because using > their brains costs money that doesn't land in budgets where the money > to destroy disks is already booked. > No., They have the wisdom of age. Crushing a disk loses maybe $20. Having a disks data stolen could cots them $billions There is no way to be assured other than by doing $10,000 worth of testing that a disks data has completely been destroyed beyond foresnic recovery, but if the disk is crushed there is certainty. Likewise the audit trails to determine whether or not the disk held any sensitive data or not are expensive to maintain and even more to trace. $20 is a small price to pay for certainty > Greetings > Marc -- The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 24 of 30 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 30 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web