Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2167

Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard?
Date Wed, 01 Jan 2014 22:46:19 +0000
Lines 19
Message-ID <bijk5qFini6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <bi7sl3F4gk4U1@mid.individual.net> <l9mieg$tmo$2@dont-email.me> <bi89flF75ajU1@mid.individual.net> <l9mtlf$nia$2@dont-email.me> <bi8dldF74f2U5@mid.individual.net> <bi8tdnFbco9U1@mid.individual.net> <52c01276$0$300$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <biakl3Flu76U1@mid.individual.net> <52c05d4a$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <bibgerFrrt0U2@mid.individual.net> <l9q2la$irb$2@dont-email.me> <52c0bbdd$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <l9v4om$24pc$1@saria.nerim.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net tC6sqhWeKtNjpYaF/zbdjw1z0ThEdoym8P8Nts65y5YC9F1fA=
Cancel-Lock sha1:t9a8hmqypXz+pSTwPyLO7k+d3oo=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
In-Reply-To <l9v4om$24pc$1@saria.nerim.net>
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:2167

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/31/2013 07:09 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Henrik Carlqvist a écrit :
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 15:02:34 -0600, philo wrote:
>>> What would be the point, you already have established that a powered hub
>>> did not do the trick.
>>
>> The point is that the powered hub by specification only gives 0.5 A which 
>> is only the same as a USB port on a motherboard which exactly complies 
>> with the USB 2.0 standard.
> 
> That's the theory. The real thing is, none of the few USB 2.0 hubs I
> have examined did control or limit in any way the current drawn on each
> port. So the current was only limited by the power supply.
> 
Either way, I've tried a Y cable on the PC to give more power that way -
to no avail.  Did not try it with the hub.  Suspect it is a
firmware/chipset clash somewhere.

Pete

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
  Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
    Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
      Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
        Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
          Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
            Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
            Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
  Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
    Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000

csiph-web