Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Why Johnny can?t code |
| Date | 2014-09-05 20:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c6uj62F1r0bU10@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <lu9h9s$847$2@dont-email.me> <c6r01uF1r0bU3@mid.individual.net> <7qbOv.133655$oe6.21707@fx29.iad> <c6tlmaF1r0bU7@mid.individual.net> <HyoOv.96081$Wt5.2864@fx01.iad> |
On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:55:17 -0600, Will Honea wrote: > Bob Eager wrote: > >>> One of the most useful approaches I ever saw to this was at a Military >>> Service Academy. All first-year and most second-year courses were >>> subject to "challenge" whereby any student could ask to take the final >>> exam rather than the course itself. Passing that exam entitled the >>> student to credit for the course and allowed him to select a >>> substitute course to fill the time - no sense letting him just goof >>> off! Most of my classmates actually graduated with credit for at >>> least 3-4 courses they never sat in. >> >> Interesting idea but if some of the learning outcomes are assessd via >> practical work and group work, harder to do. >> >> > Quite true, but in the environment the primary goal of the program was > to insure a proper grasp of fundamentals allowing earlier entry into > more advanced levels. That's where the assessments you mention > occurred. I see. We partly do that with the intro maths module - if they demonstarte yhey can do it, they can skip part of it. > It also permitted some of us to avoid classes that had nothing to do > with our individual goals - I tested out of every history course that > the Academy required freeing the time for additional engineering > courses, for example. All of our first two years in CS (of three or four) have entirely compulsory modules. When I did my electronics degree, my first term covered a variety of science based things. Physical stuff on particles, thermodynamics, astronomy, physical chemistry, microbiology.... In the second term we moved to just physics/electronics stuff. The physics labs were interesting..every week we carried out an experiment to determine a fundamental constant. So one week it was G, another week it was Boltzmann's constant, another it was Young's modulus, another it was Millikan's oil drop... -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 10:02 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-02 12:23 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-02 14:43 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-02 16:40 +0200
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-03 12:43 +1000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-09-02 15:17 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-02 18:24 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 21:01 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code greymaus <greymausg@mail.com> - 2014-09-03 14:55 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-03 18:04 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-03 14:38 -0400
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-03 19:55 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-09-03 17:33 -0400
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-03 21:35 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-09-04 15:24 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-04 20:17 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 18:56 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-03 20:59 +0200
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-02 20:50 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-03 21:05 +0200
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-02 16:56 +0200
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-02 16:09 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-04 14:57 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-09-04 15:24 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can't code Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-09-05 02:33 -0300
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-02 14:08 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 20:55 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-02 21:02 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-02 23:07 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-04 10:58 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-04 11:09 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-04 11:17 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-04 22:58 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-05 11:38 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-05 13:55 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-05 20:02 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-04 14:28 +0300
Re: Why Johnny can?t code RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2014-09-04 20:27 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-04 19:55 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-04 22:50 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-05 11:37 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-09-05 13:05 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-05 15:22 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-05 13:48 -0600
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-05 20:09 +0000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-03 12:26 +1000
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2014-09-04 00:34 +0100
Re: Why Johnny can?t code Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-09-04 15:01 +0000
csiph-web